Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39525925›Full record

ArticleThe Saudi dental journal2024

Impact of using single-file reciprocating system on the quality of root canal treatment treated by undergraduate students.

Marwa Ameen, Dunia Alhadi, Manal Almaslamani, Abdul Rahman Saleh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Saudi dental journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marwa AmeenPostgraduate Master of Science in Endodontics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Ajman University, 346 Ajman, United Arab Emirates.
Dunia AlhadiDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Dentistry, Ajman University, Ajman, Unite Arab Emirates.
Manal AlmaslamaniDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Dentistry, Ajman University, Ajman, Unite Arab Emirates.
Abdul Rahman SalehProgram Director of Master of Sciences in Endodontics, Center of Medical and Bio-allied Health Sciences Research, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Dentistry, Ajman University, Ajman 346, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the use of a single-file reciprocating system on the technical quality of root canal filling and treatment by radiographic assessment of cases treated by undergraduate dental students. Materials and methods: This was a retrospective cross-sectional clinical study of endodontically treatments conducted by fourth-year undergraduate students during the academic year 2021-2022. Root canal preparation was performed using the WaveOne Gold system with matching single-cone gutta-percha. The collected data included sex, tooth position, number of canals, and treatment time (first or second semester). The quality of the root canal filling was assessed based on the root canal filling length, density, and taper. The presence of ledges, apical transportation, perforation, and instrument separation were recorded. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 28. Chi-square tests were used, and the statistical significance level was set at P < 0.05. Results: A total of 601 teeth were included. The length of the root canal filling was adequate in 93.51 % of the teeth, underfilled in 2.82 %, and overfilled in 3.66 %. The density and taper were adequate in 96.5 % and 98.16 % of the teeth, respectively. There were no significant differences among the parameters of length, taper, density, or procedural errors relative to the arch type. However, there was a significant difference between the anterior and premolar teeth in terms of taper, density, and overall quality of the root canal filling. The overall quality of root canal treatment was acceptable in 527 teeth (87.68 %), with no significant difference between teeth (P = 0.256). Conclusion: The quality of root canal treatment performed by undergraduate students using a single-file reciprocating system is good or acceptable.

Indexed as

Root canal qualityRoot fillingSingle rotary file systemUndergraduate studentsWaveOne gold

Identifiers

PMID39525925
PMCPMC11544170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.