ArticleFoot & ankle orthopaedics2024
A Retrospective Case Series of Single-Screw vs Dual-Screw Fixation for Treatment of Medial Malleolus Fractures.
Article in Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modified 3D-Controlled Inside-Out Compression Screw Fixation Technique in Posterior Malleolar Fractures: A Narrative Review and Case Report.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Medial malleolus fractures (MMFs) are common across the world. Currently, there is a lack of consensus on the number of screws used in fixation of MMF. Our aim was to compare the radiographic outcomes of MMF with patients between fractures that have either undergone single-screw (SS) or dual-screw (DS) fixation. Methods: This retrospective study assessed patients who had undergone fixation of their MMF from 2012 to 2022. Analysis of their perioperative radiographs was performed to determine the initial type of injury and then radiographic outcomes of nonunion and malunion. Results: A total of 653 patients suffering bimalleolar fractures were identified across a 10-year period. There were 271 patients (41.50%) in the SS group and 382 in the DS group (58.50%). There was no difference found in the nonunion rate of SS (19.19% [52 of 271]) compared with DS (18.85% [72 of 382]) ( Conclusion: Use of an SS rather than DS showed a significant increase in nonanatomical reduction but did not increase nonunion or reoperation rate. Syndesmosis fixation was associated with higher rates of MMF nonunion and malunion; as such, surgeons should have a low index of suspicion of injury and fixation. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective case series.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.