ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024
Role of the Pectoralis Major Muscle Flap in the Multidisciplinary Treatment of Esophageal Cancer.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Late-onset thoracogastric airway fistula after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Successful cure of a patient with tracheoesophageal fistula in cervical esophageal cancer: A case report and review of literature.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Management of esophageal cancer is complex. Esophagectomy is associated with risk of significant complications. In this case series, we share the experience of our multidisciplinary team of thoracic surgeons and otolaryngologists in managing complications arising in the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer with the assistance of regional tissue transfer in the form of the pectoralis major flap. Methods: We present a case series highlighting 3 patients who underwent esophagectomy who experienced significant anastomotic or conduit complications which were managed with a pectoralis muscle flap. Results: Complications included tracheoesophageal fistula, refractory stenosis, and gastric conduit necrosis. Using a pectoralis major muscle flap with both myocutaneous and myofascial transfers was key to successful management. In the first patient, esophageal stent erosion after posterior tracheal wall dissection resulted in a tracheoesophageal fistula reconstructed through interposition of a myofascial flap. In the second patient, a tubed myocutaneous flap was interposed between the remnant gastric conduit and cervical esophagus to manage a posttreatment stenosis following resection of the stenosed segment. Finally, a myofascial flap was utilized to bolster a colonic interposition flap after initial necrosis of a gastric conduit that necessitated the creation of a temporary pharyngocutaneous fistula and subsequent colon interposition. Conclusions: Multidisciplinary care and collaboration are integral components for optimization of patient outcomes. In this case series, otolaryngology and thoracic surgery utilized multiple tools within their armamentarium to manage complications associated with the surgical management of esophageal cancer.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.