ArticleSurgery open science2024
A nomogram for cancer-specific survival of lung adenocarcinoma patients: A SEER based analysis.
Article in Surgery open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable machine-learning prediction of overall and cancer-specific survival in adult triple-negative breast cancer using SEER: a comparative study of nomograms and random survival forests.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Clinical significance and biological function of PRKCQ-AS1/miR-582-3p expression in LUAD.Hereditas · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 85 % of lung cancer cases. Among NSCLC subtypes, lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) stands as the most prevalent. Regrettably, LUAD continues to exhibit a notably unfavorable overall prognosis. This study's primary aim was to develop and validate prognostic tools capable of predicting the likelihood of cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with LUAD. Methods: We retrospectively collected 21,099 patients diagnosed with LUAD between 2010 and 2015, and 8290 patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2009 from SEER database. The cohort of 21,099 patients served as the prognostic group for the exploration of LUAD-related prognostic risk factors. The cohort of 8290 patients was designated for external validation. We created a training set and an internal validation set in the prognostic group for the development and internal validation of CSS nomograms. CSS predictors were identified through the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regression analysis. Prognostic model was constructed via Cox hazard regression analysis, presented in the form of both static and dynamic network-based nomograms. Results: Several independent prognostic factors were incorporated into the construction of nomogram. The nomogram accurately predicted CSS at 1, 3, and 5 years, with respective AUC values of 0.769, 0.761, and 0.748 for the training group, and 0.741, 0.752, and 0.740 for the testing group. The study demonstrated a strong agreement between anticipated and actual CSS values, supported by decision curve analysis (DCA) and time-dependent calibrated curves. High-risk patients based on the nomogram exhibiting significantly lower survival rates compared to their low-risk counterparts according to Kaplan-Meier (K-M) curves. The nomogram demonstrates excellent predictive power in the external validation cohort. Conclusions: A dependable and user-friendly nomogram has been developed, available in both static and online dynamic calculator formats, to facilitate healthcare professionals in accurately estimating the likelihood of CSS for patients diagnosed LUAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.