ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2024
Centerline-guided reinforcement learning model for pancreatic duct identifications.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is forecast to become the second most significant cause of cancer mortality as the number of patients with cancer in the main duct of the pancreas grows, and measurement of the pancreatic duct diameter from medical images has been identified as relevant for its early diagnosis. Approach: We propose an automated pancreatic duct centerline tracing method from computed tomography (CT) images that is based on deep reinforcement learning, which employs an artificial agent to interact with the environment and calculates rewards by combining the distances from the target and the centerline. A deep neural network is implemented to forecast step-wise values for each potential action. With the help of this mechanism, the agent can probe along the pancreatic duct centerline using the best possible navigational path. To enhance the tracing accuracy, we employ landmark-based registration, which enables the generation of a probability map of the pancreatic duct. Subsequently, we utilize a gradient-based method on the registered data to extract a probability map specifically indicating the centerline of the pancreatic duct. Results: Three datasets with a total of 115 CT images were used to evaluate the proposed method. Using image hold-out from the first two datasets, the method performance was 2.0, 4.0, and 2.1 mm measured in terms of the mean detection error, Hausdorff distance (HD), and root mean squared error (RMSE), respectively. Using the first two datasets for training and the third one for testing, the method accuracy was 2.2, 4.9, and 2.6 mm measured in terms of the mean detection error, HD, and RMSE, respectively. Conclusions: We present an algorithm for automated pancreatic duct centerline tracing using deep reinforcement learning. We observe that validation on an external dataset confirms the potential for practical utilization of the presented method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.