ReviewCJC open2024
Molecular Features of Calcific Aortic Stenosis in Female and Male Patients.
Review in CJC open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting the aldosterone-mineralocorticoid receptor pathway in cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2026Review
- Sex-Specific Differences in Clinical Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Meta-Analysis of Reconstructed Individual Patient Survival Data.Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team · 2026Article
- Determinants of systolic murmurs without significant valvular heart disease in an unselected Norwegian adult population: the Tromsø Study.Open heart · 2026Article
- The potential role of sex related differences of the microbiome and its impact on calcific aortic stenosis: a narrative review.Biology of sex differences · 2026Review
- Specificities of Aortic Stenosis in Women - From Diagnosis to Management.Saudi medical journal · 2026Review
- Trimethylamine-N-oxide promotes fibrotic activation of quiescent valvular interstitial cells via endoplasmic reticulum stress.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Shared Risk Factors and Molecular Mechanisms Between Aortic Stenosis and Atherosclerosis: A Rationale for Therapeutic Repositioning.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Aortic Stenosis: Time for a Sex-Based Approach?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past 15 years, sex-related differences in aortic valve (AV) stenosis (AS) have been highlighted, affecting various aspects of AS, such as the pathophysiology, AV lesions, left ventricle remodelling, and outcomes. Female patients were found to present a more profibrotic pattern of leaflet remodelling and/or thickening, whereas male patients have a preponderance of calcification within stenosed leaflets. The understanding of these sex differences is still limited, owing to the underrepresentation of female patients in many basic and clinical research studies and trials. A better understanding of sex differences in the pathophysiology of AS may highlight new therapeutic targets that potentially could be sex-specific. This review aims to summarize sex-related differences in AS, as discovered from basic research experiments, covering aspects of the disease ranging from leaflet composition to signalling pathways, sex hormones, genetics and/or transcriptomics, and potential sex-adapted medical treatments.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.