ArticleCJC open2024
Sex Disparities in the Use and Outcomes of Septal Reduction Therapies for Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.
Article in CJC open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of Mavacamten Approval on Septal Reduction Therapy Rates in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Data are limited that examine potential sex-based disparities in the utilization and complications of septal reduction therapy (SRT) in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Our aim was to assess the use and in-hospital outcomes of SRT, according to sex. We performed a retrospective cohort study using the 2017-2019 National Inpatient Sample database. Adult patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy were identified. Methods: We assessed the use of SRT (surgical septal myectomy and alcohol septal ablation), according to sex. In those who underwent SRT, rates of in-hospital mortality, pacemaker implantation, implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation, ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and pericardial complication were assessed. All outcomes were compared between groups using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), adjusting for demographics, comorbidity burden, and hospital characteristics. Results: In total, 72,680 weighted hospitalizations (median age: 67 years [range: 57-77]; 61% female patients) were included, and only 5.9% of patients underwent SRT. After IPTW adjustment, female patients were more likely to undergo SRT (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 1.18, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.03-1.36) and alcohol septal ablation (aRR 1.38, 95% CI 1.04-1.83). Likewise, female patients received pacemaker implantation more often (aRR 1.96, 95% CI 1.10-3.50) and ICD implantation (aRR 0.58, 95% CI 0.34-0.99) less frequently, compared with male patients. No differences were present in rates of surgical septal myectomy, in-hospital mortality, ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and pericardial complication between groups. Conclusions: Our results suggest that female patients were slightly more likely to undergo SRT, especially alcohol septal ablation. In-hospital mortality and postprocedural complications were similar between the sexes, but women received more pacemaker implantation and less ICD implantation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.