ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024
Safety, efficacy, and side effects of sodium fluorescein-aided resection of glioblastoma: a quasi-experimental study.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Advancements in Glioblastoma Multiforme Treatment: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Brain and behavior · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy Assessment of Supramarginal Resection Versus Gross Total Resection in Glioblastoma: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.Brain and behavior · 2026Pooled it
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The use of fluorescein sodium (FS) as a surgical adjunct in glioblastoma resection has shown promise in improving tumor visualization and resection outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and side effects of FS-aided resection in patients with glioblastoma. Methods: This is a prospective, single-center cohort study conducted at Ibrahim Cardiac Hospital and Research Institute from September 2021 to November 2023. Twelve patients with histologically confirmed glioblastoma underwent FS-guided resection. All participants received an intravenous dose of FS (5 mg/kg body weight) ~30 min before surgery. The study follows a quasi-experimental design, focusing on the outcomes of FS-aided surgery without a control group. Patients were selected based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, and all surgeries were performed by a single experienced neurosurgeon. The extent of tumor resection was classified as gross total resection (GTR), near-total resection (NTR), or partial resection (PR). Results: Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 66.6% of patients, near total resection (NTR) in 16.6%, and subtotal resection (STR) in 16.6%. No significant adverse effects were observed except for a single case of postoperative seizure, which was managed without long-term consequences. All patients showed normal liver and kidney function tests postoperatively. The low-dose FS protocol demonstrated both a high rate of GTR and a favorable safety profile, with only minor, transient side effects such as temporary yellow discoloration of the skin, sclera, and urine. No severe or long-term complications related to FS were observed during the follow-up period, which had a median duration of 13.4 months. Conclusion: FS appears to be a safe and effective aid in glioblastoma resection, achieving high rates of GTR with minimal side effects. The findings suggest that FS, particularly at a low dose, is a viable, cost-effective alternative to other fluorescent markers, especially in settings where resource constraints may limit the use of more expensive options like 5-ALA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.