ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024
Ten-year evaluation on efficacy, safety, and predictability of femtosecond laser corneal small incision lenticule extraction for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism: a case series.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The objective was to evaluate the 10-year long-term outcomes of patients undergoing small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Methods: In this continuous case series, the authors enrolled a total of 113 patients (208 eyes) who underwent SMILE 10 years prior. Measured parameters included uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and cycloplegia spherical equivalent error (SER). Results: One hundred thirteen patients were enrolled in this study. Patients' age ranged from 18 to 44 years (mean: 30.2 years). One hundred ninety-three eyes (92.8%) and 176 eyes (84.6%) had an UCVA≥20/20 at 3 months and 10 years postoperatively. The mean efficacy index, measured at 3 months and 10 years postoperatively, were 1.041 and 1.023, respectively; the difference was not statistically significant. Three months after the operation, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) decreased by 1 line in 19 eyes (9.1%), remained unchanged in 158 eyes (76.0%), and increased by ≥1 line in 31 eyes (14.9%). Ten years after operation, BCVA decreased by 2 lines in 15 eyes (7.2%) and by 1 line in 35 eyes (16.8%); remained unchanged in 142 eyes (68.3%); increased ≥1 line in 16 eyes (7.7%). The mean safety index, measured at 3 months and 10 years postoperatively, were 1.147 and 1.331, respectively; the difference was not statistically significant. The mean SER at 3 months and 10 years postoperatively was -0.112 and -0.276, respectively; the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion: There was a decrease in SER 10 years after SMILE surgery compared with 3 months postoperatively, there was no significant decrease in the efficacy index or safety index.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.