ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024
Management of recurrent end-stage achalasia with robotic-assisted esophagectomy: a case report and literature review.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and Importance: Achalasia, an uncommon esophageal motility disorder, presents therapeutic challenges, especially in refractory cases with a history of multiple surgeries. Here, we present a complex case illustrating the dilemmas and multidisciplinary approach required in managing such patients. This case underscores the relevance of newer techniques like robotic-assisted esophagectomy in refractory achalasia management. Case Presentation: A 53-year-old male with recurrent achalasia endured persistent dysphagia, reflux, and esophageal spasms despite undergoing Heller myotomies, fundoplications, and hiatal hernia repairs. Imaging revealed severe esophageal dilation and anatomical alterations post-surgeries. Opting for a robotic-assisted thoracoabdominal esophagectomy due to relentless symptoms, the patient faced technical hurdles due to adhesions and a dilated esophagus. Post-surgery, complications like thoracic duct injury, milky pleural effusion, atrial fibrillation, and limb ischemia arose, necessitating multidisciplinary intervention. Clinical discussion: Managing refractory achalasia poses significant challenges, particularly in extensively operated patients. Despite aggressive surgeries, debilitating symptoms persisted, emphasizing the need for a multidisciplinary approach. Complications like thoracic duct injury and atrial fibrillation further complicate management, highlighting the intricacies of such cases. Careful consideration of surgical options and the potential of newer techniques like POEM are crucial in navigating such complexities. Conclusion: Managing refractory achalasia, especially in patients with extensive surgical histories, requires a multidisciplinary approach and careful consideration of treatment options. This case underscores the evolving landscape of achalasia management and emphasizes the potential benefits of newer techniques like POEM in select cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.