ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024
Emergency esophagectomy for esophageal perforation following balloon dilation due to stenosis post-endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal cancer: a case report.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in the treatment of postoperative anastomotic strictures in esophageal cancer a comparative analysis of the efficacy of endoscopic versus interventional dilatation.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Review
- Right pneumothorax during endoscopic balloon dilation for oesophageal stricture following tracheoesophageal fistula surgery: a case report.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Esophageal Perforation Following Pneumatic Dilation in Esophageal Achalasia Successfully Managed with Two-Stage Laparoscopic Surgery.Surgical case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and importance: Esophageal perforation from endoscopic dilation is rare (0.53-0.6% incidence) but serious, with mortality rates of 12.5-20%. Optimal treatment is debated and depends on the medical facility's capabilities, the patient's symptoms, the extent of perforation, and the severity of associated lesions. Treatment options include medical management (fasting, antibiotics), esophageal stenting, surgical closure, or emergency esophagectomy. Early diagnosis and treatment are crucial to reduce mortality and hospital stay. Case presentation: A 49-year-old male with lower third esophageal cancer (stage cT1aN0M0) underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and developed esophageal stenosis. Dilation attempts led to esophageal perforation, necessitating emergency esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction. The patient improved and was discharged on day 10 post-operation without complications. Clinical discussion: Managing esophageal perforation post-endoscopic dilation is complex. This case highlights the importance of rapid recognition and intervention. Esophageal dilation, while effective for stenosis, carries a perforation risk. Treatment decisions must be tailored to individual patients, considering perforation severity, patient's health, and facility resources. Here, severe perforation and clinical condition warranted emergency esophagectomy. The successful outcome underscores the efficacy of this surgical intervention when performed timely at specialized centers. Conclusion: Emergency esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction for treating esophageal perforation due to stenosis post-endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal cancer is considered a safe procedure and can be performed at an experienced esophageal surgery center.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.