Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39525750›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024

Emergency esophagectomy for esophageal perforation following balloon dilation due to stenosis post-endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal cancer: a case report.

Binh Van Pham, Duy Duc Nguyen, Manh Dai Tran, Thanh Duy Nguyen, An Duc Thai, Hoa Thi Thanh Nguyen

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Binh Van PhamAbdominal Surgery Department 1 and Robotic Surgery Center, Vietnam National Cancer Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Duy Duc NguyenAbdominal Surgery Department 1, Vietnam National Cancer Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Manh Dai TranAbdominal Surgery Department 1, Vietnam National Cancer Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Thanh Duy NguyenAbdominal Surgery Department 1, Vietnam National Cancer Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
An Duc ThaiAbdominal Surgery Department 1, Vietnam National Cancer Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Hoa Thi Thanh NguyenClinical Nutrition Center, Vietnam National Cancer Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6134-0752

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction and importance: Esophageal perforation from endoscopic dilation is rare (0.53-0.6% incidence) but serious, with mortality rates of 12.5-20%. Optimal treatment is debated and depends on the medical facility's capabilities, the patient's symptoms, the extent of perforation, and the severity of associated lesions. Treatment options include medical management (fasting, antibiotics), esophageal stenting, surgical closure, or emergency esophagectomy. Early diagnosis and treatment are crucial to reduce mortality and hospital stay. Case presentation: A 49-year-old male with lower third esophageal cancer (stage cT1aN0M0) underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and developed esophageal stenosis. Dilation attempts led to esophageal perforation, necessitating emergency esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction. The patient improved and was discharged on day 10 post-operation without complications. Clinical discussion: Managing esophageal perforation post-endoscopic dilation is complex. This case highlights the importance of rapid recognition and intervention. Esophageal dilation, while effective for stenosis, carries a perforation risk. Treatment decisions must be tailored to individual patients, considering perforation severity, patient's health, and facility resources. Here, severe perforation and clinical condition warranted emergency esophagectomy. The successful outcome underscores the efficacy of this surgical intervention when performed timely at specialized centers. Conclusion: Emergency esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction for treating esophageal perforation due to stenosis post-endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal cancer is considered a safe procedure and can be performed at an experienced esophageal surgery center.

Indexed as

case reportemergency esophagectomyesophageal canceresophageal perforation

Identifiers

PMID39525750
PMCPMC11543194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.