ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024
Surgical resection of a rare scalp arteriovenous malformation: a case report.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and importance: Scalp arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are intricate vascular anomalies with abnormal connections between arteries and veins in the scalp, leading to serious complications and cosmetic concerns. Managing scalp AVMs is particularly complex in young female patients, where both functional and aesthetic outcomes are crucial. This case report highlights the successful treatment of a young woman with a scalp AVM, emphasizing the importance of early diagnosis and a multidisciplinary approach. Case presentation: A 30-year-old female presented with a pulsatile scalp mass and significant cosmetic concerns. Diagnostic imaging, including ultrasonography, brain CT scan, MRI, and carotid CT angiogram, confirmed a scalp AVM. The patient underwent a comprehensive treatment plan beginning with endovascular embolization to reduce blood flow to the AVM, followed by surgical resection to remove the lesion. Postoperative follow-up showed a marked reduction in symptoms and lesion volume, with no complications observed. Clinical discussion: Scalp AVMs, though rare, require prompt diagnosis due to the risk of severe complications such as hemorrhage and cosmetic impact. In this case, a combination of ultrasonography, CT, and MRI provided a detailed assessment of the AVM. A multidisciplinary approach, involving interventional radiology and surgical expertise, was crucial for success. Endovascular embolization minimized intraoperative bleeding and simplified surgical resection, leading to significant symptom and cosmetic improvements. Continuous monitoring is essential for long-term success and early detection of recurrences. Conclusion: This case underscores the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary approach in managing scalp AVMs in young female patients. Early diagnosis through advanced imaging techniques enables timely and targeted intervention. The combined use of endovascular embolization and surgical resection led to significant symptom resolution and aesthetic enhancement. Collaboration among specialists is vital for optimizing outcomes, and ongoing research will further refine treatment strategies, improving the quality of life for patients with scalp AVMs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.