ArticleTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2024
Therapy-relevant
Article in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cholangiocarcinomas (CCA) are a group of aggressive malignancies with poor prognosis. The distinct subtypes are related to different etiologies and genetic aberrations that are subject to targeted therapies. Mouse double minute 2 homolog (MDM2) is a potent inhibitor of tumor suppressor p53 and is proven to be altered in certain carcinomas. Novel targeted drugs, such as the MDM2-p53 antagonist Brigimadlin, have shown promising results for therapeutic efficacy in patients with Objectives: This study therefore aimed to characterize CCAs regarding their MDM2 status, compare the concordance between fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) methods, and elucidate the role of Design: Retrospective cohort study. Methods: All patients ( Results: We included 52 patients with primary CCA, three of which showed positive Conclusion: Real-world evidence in our Caucasian patient population confirmed that a significant number of intrahepatic CCAs showcase
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.