Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39525662›Full record

ArticlePeerJ physical chemistry2022

Using genetic programming to predict and optimize protein function.

Iliya Miralavy, Alexander R Bricco, Assaf A Gilad, Wolfgang Banzhaf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ physical chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Machine learning-based development of Gadolinium binding peptides.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Computational peptide discovery with a genetic programming approach.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Development of a Synthetic Biosensor for Chemical Exchange MRI UtilizingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Iliya MiralavyBEACON Center of Evolution in Action, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States of America.
Alexander R BriccoBEACON Center of Evolution in Action, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States of America.
Assaf A GiladBEACON Center of Evolution in Action, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States of America.
Wolfgang BanzhafBEACON Center of Evolution in Action, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States of America.

Funding

Training/Dissemination-Resource for Molecular Imaging Agents in Precision MedicineP41EB024495 · NIBIB · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI MARTIN G POMPER · 2017 to 2026
$11.8M
Clinically Translatable MRI Reporter Genes and Imaging Methods with Ultra-High Specificity and SensitivityR01EB031008 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI CHRISTIAN T FARRAR · 2021 to 2026
$4.0M
Evolution and optimization of synthetic <READ/WRITE> function from and into cells using genetic programmingR01EB030565 · NIBIB · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BANZHAF, WOLFGANG, GILAD, ASSAF A · 2021 to 2024
$2.3M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB024495NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB030565NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB031008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein engineers conventionally use tools such as Directed Evolution to find new proteins with better functionalities and traits. More recently, computational techniques and especially machine learning approaches have been recruited to assist Directed Evolution, showing promising results. In this article, we propose POET, a computational Genetic Programming tool based on evolutionary computation methods to enhance screening and mutagenesis in Directed Evolution and help protein engineers to find proteins that have better functionality. As a proof-of-concept, we use peptides that generate MRI contrast detected by the Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer contrast mechanism. The evolutionary methods used in POET are described, and the performance of POET in different epochs of our experiments with Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer contrast are studied. Our results indicate that a computational modeling tool like POET can help to find peptides with 400% better functionality than used before.

Indexed as

Biophysical ChemistryDirected evolutionEvolutionary computationGenetic programmingMRI contrast agentsProtein optimizationTheoretical and Computational Chemistry

Identifiers

PMID39525662
PMCPMC11545857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.