Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39525654›Full record

ArticleData in brief2024

Banana and Guava dataset for machine learning and deep learning-based quality classification.

Abiban Kumari, Jaswinder Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Abiban KumariDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology, Hisar 125001, Haryana, India.
Jaswinder SinghDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology, Hisar 125001, Haryana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the field of agriculture, the identification and classification of fruits have become necessary for sustainable growth in horticulture sectors. Recently, different types of advanced techniques have been used for the identification and classification of fruits. Machine learning is an emerging technology with robust application in different sectors that can be used for the classification of fruits. The basic requirement for the machine learning techniques is the availability of the dataset to develop a robust machine learning model. But the limited availability of the data set is one of the major challenges in this sector. The classification of fruits using non-destructive methods can be executed through the availability of a comprehensive dataset. The rapid and precise classification of the fruit according to their quality and maturity is the desired need of the fruit storage, processing, and export industries. Therefore, this article provides a comprehensive dataset for fruits (banana and guava) and their classification according to their quality classes. The dataset was acquired using a Redmi Note 10-Pro mobile camera in natural sunlight at different angles for different classes in JPG format. The acquired dataset was classified into three different categories, Class A, Class B, and Defect, based on their physiological changes. The obtained datasets can be used for the development of different machine learning models for the quality classification of banana and guava.

Indexed as

Computer visionDeep learningFruit classificationImage processingMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID39525654
PMCPMC11547028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.