ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Survival of pediatric patients with ependymoma in a tertiary cancer center in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AOSNP-ADAPTR resource level-based recommendations on practical diagnostic strategies for ependymomas.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Ependymoma is the third most frequent central malignant nervous system tumor in the pediatric age group. There is scarce data in the literature on survival of these patients, especially in upper and lower middle-income countries. We aimed to describe the clinical and demographic characteristics, treatment, and outcome of pediatric patients with ependymoma admitted to a public cancer hospital. Methods: Retrospective analysis of medical records of patients with ependymoma, admitted to the Pediatric Oncology department (0-20 years) during the period of 2000-2022. Data on patient, disease characteristics, and treatment were analyzed. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Seventy-two patients were evaluated; median age at diagnosis was 6.5 years (range: 1-20), 63% were male, 54% of the tumors were in the posterior fossa (PF-EPN), 45% were classified as WHO grade 3, and 68% were operated on in other institutions before referral. Regarding treatment, 72% underwent radiotherapy and 33% of patients underwent chemotherapy. Almost 70% percent of the patients had relapses. The median follow-up time was 5.2 years (Range: 0,1-21,4). The OS in 5 years was 67%. Totally resected tumors had OS in 5 years of 88% (p: 0.028). Conclusion: The results achieved in this series show a survival gap between UMIC and HIC. Relapses occurred mainly in the first ten years and then reached a plateau, with the majority of patients experiencing endocrinological and neurological sequelae.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.