ReviewFrontiers in oncology2024
Major contributors to FLASH sparing efficacy emerge from murine skin studies: dose rate, total dose per fraction, anesthesia and oxygenation.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- FLASH radiotherapy enables dose escalation resulting in improved survival in an orthotopic muscle-invasive bladder cancer mouse model.The British journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Systematic tissue oxygen variation shows the modulation of murine skin radiation toxicity at ultra-high dose rates.Physics in medicine and biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Systematic analysis of biological endpoint variability and implications for quantitative modeling of the FLASH sparing effect.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Review
- FLASH effect is diminished by daily fractionation of electron RT in mouse skin.Physics in medicine and biology · 2025Article
- Intermediate tissue oxygen level is required to observe murine FLASH skin sparing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Emerging Technologies in Radiation Therapy: Replacing Traditional Isotope-based Modalities.Health physics · 2025Review
- FLASH radiotherapy at a crossroads: a bibliometric perspective on progress and challenges.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Anesthesia is a potent determinant of ultra-high dose rate sparing in the murine total abdominal irradiation model.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Mechanisms of the FLASH effect: current insights and advances.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Normal tissue sparing from radiation damage upon ultra-high dose rate irradiation, known as the FLASH effect with an equivalent tumor response, has been widely reported in murine skin models, and translation of this type of radiotherapy to humans has already begun, with skin sparing being a primary outcome expected. Methods: This study reviews the status of the field, focusing on the proposed mechanisms and skin response assays, outlining what has become known in terms of input parameters that might control the magnitude of the FLASH effect. Results: Murine studies have largely focused on acute damage responses, developing over 3-8 weeks, to single doses of FLASH versus conventional dose rate (CDR), suggesting that at dose rates above tens of Gray per second, with a total dose of more than 20 Gy, the FLASH effect is induced. Fractionated delivery appears to be possible, although fraction sizes >17 Gy appear to be needed for sparing efficacy. The interplay between the dose rate and total dose per fraction remains to be fully elucidated. Oxygen is a modulator of efficacy, with both hypoxia and hyperoxia diminishing the effect of FLASH. Measurement of transient changes in oxygen levels is possible and may be a marker of treatment efficacy. Conclusion: Taken together, murine skin data provide important information for translational studies, despite the associated limitations. Studies of later-term sparing effects, as well as studies on pig skin, are needed to take the next step in assessing translational FLASH efficacy. The control of biological factors, such as tissue oxygenation, may be required to understand and control the response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.