Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39525616›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Nodal radiotherapy for prostate adenocarcinoma recurrence: predictive factors for efficacy.

Anna Gueiderikh, Jérémy Baude, David Baron, Renaud Schiappa, Sandrine Katsahian, Damien Moreau, Marc Laurans, Jean-Emmanuel Bibault, Sarah Kreps, Pierre-Yves Bondiau and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Anna GueiderikhRadiation Oncology Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris Sorbonne Cité, Paris, France.
Jérémy BaudeRadiation Oncology Department, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
David BaronRadiation Oncology Department, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France.
Renaud SchiappaEpidemiology, Biostatistic and Health Data Department, University Cote d'Azur, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France.
Sandrine KatsahianUniversité Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Damien MoreauRadiation Oncology Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris Sorbonne Cité, Paris, France.
Marc LauransRadiation Oncology Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris Sorbonne Cité, Paris, France.
Jean-Emmanuel BibaultRadiation Oncology Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris Sorbonne Cité, Paris, France.
Sarah KrepsRadiation Oncology Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris Sorbonne Cité, Paris, France.
Pierre-Yves BondiauRadiation Oncology Department, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France.
Magali QuivrinRadiation Oncology Department, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Alexis LépinoyRadiation Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
David PasquierAcademic Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre O. Lambret, Lille, France.
Jean-Michel Hannoun-LeviRadiation Oncology Department, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France.
Philippe GiraudRadiation Oncology Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris Sorbonne Cité, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Nodes are the second site for prostate cancer recurrence. Whole-pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT) has shown superiority over nodal stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in two retrospective cohorts. We aimed to compare both modalities and assess factors associated with treatment outcomes. Materials and methods: This retrospective multicentric cohort study included patients from five institutions spanning from 2010 to 2022. Patients had a history of prostatic adenocarcinoma classified as N0 M0 at diagnosis with a first nodal-only pelvic castration-sensitive recurrence. Failure-free survival (FFS) was defined as the time from the end of RT to the first failure event-biochemical or imaging recurrence, or death. Results: A total of 147 patients (pts) were analyzed, mainly treated for a recurrence after initial prostatectomy (87%), with 64 (43.5%) undergoing SBRT and 83 (56.5%) undergoing WPRT. SBRT was chosen mainly for dosimetric constraints (67%) and was associated with a lower rate of concomitant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) prescription. With a median follow-up of 68 months [inter-quartile range (IQR) = 51], FFS was significantly lower in the SBRT group (p < 0.0001). In multivariable analysis, WPRT and ADT were associated with a longer FFS. Factors associated with a longer FFS after SBRT included associated ADT, lower prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, a PSA doubling time >6 months, and a Gleason score <8. SBRT was associated with a lower rate of genitourinary and gastrointestinal grade ≥2 complications. Discussion: For an isolated pelvic nodal prostate cancer recurrence, SBRT is associated with a shorter FFS compared to WPRT. SBRT is often more convenient for patients and leaves further pelvic salvage options available, so it can be explored as an option for well-informed patients.

Indexed as

androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)nodal recurrenceprostate adenocarcinomaPSA doubling timeSBRT (stereotactic body radiation therapy)whole pelvic radiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID39525616
PMCPMC11543566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.