Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39525610›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2024

Intake Patterns and Experiences of Patients Using Direct Oral Anticoagulants Measured by Electronic Monitoring in Community Pharmacies.

Sara Desmaele, Andreas Capiau, Maxim Grymonprez, Antoine Pironet, Stephane Steurbaut, Silas Rydant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sara DesmaeleMeduplace, Koninklijke Apothekersvereniging van Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0009-0005-3965-935X
Andreas CapiauPharmaceutical Care Unit, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2458-5237
Maxim GrymonprezPharmaceutical Care Unit, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Antoine PironetAARDEX Group, Seraing, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1610-3050
Stephane Steurbaut *Centre for Pharmaceutical Research, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Jette, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4586-6919
Silas Rydant *Meduplace, Koninklijke Apothekersvereniging van Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Several international organizations advocate for monitoring of adherence to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), given the prevalent issue of suboptimal adherence to DOACs. The aim was to investigate intake patterns in patients on DOAC therapy by electronic monitoring of medication adherence in community pharmacies (using a Medication Event Monitoring System Patients and Methods: Patients using apixaban, rivaroxaban or edoxaban and visiting a community pharmacy, were included. Adherence was electronically monitored over a twelve-week period. Pharmacists conducted data readings from the electronic device at six and twelve weeks, and discussed these data with the patients. At the beginning and end of the study, patients completed a questionnaire about their expectations and experiences respectively. Results: Eighty-nine patients were included and high taking adherence rates were observed (median adherence of 100% for once-daily dosed patients and 96.7% for twice-daily dosed patients), but more than half of the patients took at least one dose too late or skipped at least one dose, possibly resulting in temporarily reduced protection against thromboembolic events. Most patients who felt that their adherence had improved, believed this was due to the combination of the electronic device and the personal follow-up by the pharmacist. Although most patients stated that medication adherence is their own responsibility, they were grateful for the support they received from their community pharmacist. Conclusion: High adherence rates were observed, but there was still room for improvement regarding intake moments. Positive experiences with an electronic device for medication adherence monitoring were reported.

Indexed as

adherenceanticoagulationcommunity pharmacistelectronic adherence monitoring

Identifiers

PMID39525610
PMCPMC11550688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.