ArticleDigital health
Factors influencing Chinese doctors to use medical large language models.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors associated with willingness to receive an adult tetanus booster in China: A cross-sectional study incorporating behavioral factor analysis.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
- Performance of large language models in urological decision support: a guideline-based comparative evaluation in urolithiasis.Urolithiasis · 2026Article
- Identifying necessary conditions for medical students' adoption of AI in the future practice: a survey study in Canada.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Evaluation of AI tool assisting primary healthcare physicians to diagnostic and treatment tasks.Family medicine and community health · 2026Article
- Identifying Measurement Dimensions of Users' Benefit-Risk Perceptions of AI in Healthcare: A Scoping Review.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The integration of medical large language models (MLLMs) into healthcare has garnered global interest, however, the determinants of their adoption by medical professionals remain underexplored. This study aims to elucidate the factors influencing doctors' intention to utilize MLLMs, encompassing both psychological determinants and demographic attributes. Methods: An extended theoretical model was developed using constructs derived from the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and five constructs. A hybrid online and offline survey was conducted from March to December 2023, including 955 Chinese medical practitioners. Structural equation modeling was utilized to test the research hypotheses. Results: The measurement model exhibited satisfactory reliability and validity, with fit indices meeting scholarly standards. Perceived ease of use emerged as a significant predictor of both perceived usefulness and satisfaction. Content quality was identified as a substantial influence on perceived satisfaction but did not significantly predict perceived usefulness. Technical support and social influence were found to significantly affect perceived usefulness without directly impacting satisfaction. Perceived usefulness positively influenced both satisfaction and usage behavior, while perceived risk had a negative effect. A significant relationship between perceived satisfaction and usage behavior was established, with gender, age, education, and professional title moderating this relationship. Conclusions: The study provides empirical evidence for understanding the adoption of MLLMs by Chinese doctors, offering management implications for future technical research, development, and implementation in the medical field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.