Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39525494›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for uncertainty quantification2020

MULTIFIDELITY ESTIMATORS FOR CORONARY CIRCULATION MODELS UNDER CLINICALLY INFORMED DATA UNCERTAINTY.

Jongmin Seo, Casey Fleeter, Andrew M Kahn, Alison L Marsden, Daniele E Schiavazzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for uncertainty quantification, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Quantification of total uncertainty in the physics-informed reconstruction of CVSim-6 physiology.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Automated generation of 0D and 1D reduced-order models of patient-specific blood flow.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jongmin SeoDepartment of Pediatrics (Cardiology), Bioengineering and ICME, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Casey FleeterInstitue for Computational Mathematics and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Andrew M KahnDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Alison L MarsdenDepartment of Pediatrics (Cardiology), Bioengineering and ICME, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Daniele E SchiavazziDepartment of Applied and Computational Mathematics and Statistics, University of Notre Dame, Indiana, USA.

Funding

Multiscale modeling for vein graft failure risk stratification in CABG patientsR01HL123689 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MARSDEN, ALISON L · 2014 to 2018
$1.9M
Enabling reliable cardiovascular simulations via uncertainty quantificationR01EB018302 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MARSDEN, ALISON L · 2016 to 2019
$1.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL123689NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB018302
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerical models are increasingly used for noninvasive diagnosis and treatment planning in coronary artery disease, where service-based technologies have proven successful in identifying hemodynamically significant and hence potentially dangerous vascular anomalies. Despite recent progress towards clinical adoption, many results in the field are still based on a deterministic characterization of blood flow, with no quantitative assessment of the variability of simulation outputs due to uncertainty from multiple sources. In this study, we focus on parameters that are essential to construct accurate patient-specific representations of the coronary circulation, such as aortic pressure waveform and intramyocardial pressure, and quantify how their uncertainty affects clinically relevant model outputs. We construct a deformable model of the left coronary artery subject to a prescribed inlet pressure and with open-loop outlet boundary conditions, treating fluid-structure interaction through an arbitrary-Lagrangian-Eulerian framework. Random input uncertainty is estimated directly from repeated clinical measurements from intracoronary catheterization and complemented by literature data. We also achieve significant computational cost reductions in uncertainty propagation thanks to multifidelity Monte Carlo estimators of the outputs of interest, leveraging the ability to generate, at practically no cost, one- and zero-dimensional low-fidelity representations of left coronary artery flow, with appropriate boundary conditions. The results demonstrate how the use of multifidelity control variate estimators leads to significant reductions in variance and accuracy improvements with respect to traditional Monte Carlo. In particular, the combination of three-dimensional hemodynamics simulations and zero-dimensional lumped parameter network models produces the best results, with only a negligible (less than 1%) computational overhead.

Indexed as

cardiovascular simulationcoronary artery hemodynamicsmulti-fidelity frameworkuncertainty quantification

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.