ArticleInternational journal for uncertainty quantification2020
MULTIFIDELITY ESTIMATORS FOR CORONARY CIRCULATION MODELS UNDER CLINICALLY INFORMED DATA UNCERTAINTY.
Article in International journal for uncertainty quantification, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating Uncertainty Quantification into Computational Fluid Dynamics Models of Coronary Arteries Under Steady Flow.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2026Article
- On the performance of multi-fidelity and reduced-dimensional neural emulators for inference of physiological boundary conditions.Computers in biology and medicine · 2026Article
- Personalized and uncertainty-aware coronary hemodynamics simulations: From Bayesian estimation to improved multi-fidelity uncertainty quantification.Computer methods and programs in biomedicine · 2025Article
- Quantification of total uncertainty in the physics-informed reconstruction of CVSim-6 physiology.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025Article
- Hybrid physics-based and data-driven modeling of vascular bifurcation pressure differences.Computers in biology and medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Improved multifidelity Monte Carlo estimators based on normalizing flows and dimensionality reduction techniques.Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering · 2024Article
- Quantification of total uncertainty in the physics-informed reconstruction of CVSim-6 physiology.ArXiv · 2024Article
- Personalized coronary and myocardial blood flow models incorporating CT perfusion imaging and synthetic vascular trees.Npj imaging · 2024Article
- Personalized coronary and myocardial blood flow models incorporating CT perfusion imaging and synthetic vascular trees.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
- Beyond CFD: Emerging methodologies for predictive simulation in cardiovascular health and disease.Biophysics reviews · 2023Review
- Reducing Geometric Uncertainty in Computational Hemodynamics by Deep Learning-Assisted Parallel-Chain MCMC.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2022Article
- Automated generation of 0D and 1D reduced-order models of patient-specific blood flow.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2022Article
- On the Periodicity of Cardiovascular Fluid Dynamics Simulations.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2021Article
- Application of physics-based flow models in cardiovascular medicine: Current practices and challenges.Biophysics reviews · 2021Review
- The effects of clinically-derived parametric data uncertainty in patient-specific coronary simulations with deformable walls.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Numerical models are increasingly used for noninvasive diagnosis and treatment planning in coronary artery disease, where service-based technologies have proven successful in identifying hemodynamically significant and hence potentially dangerous vascular anomalies. Despite recent progress towards clinical adoption, many results in the field are still based on a deterministic characterization of blood flow, with no quantitative assessment of the variability of simulation outputs due to uncertainty from multiple sources. In this study, we focus on parameters that are essential to construct accurate patient-specific representations of the coronary circulation, such as aortic pressure waveform and intramyocardial pressure, and quantify how their uncertainty affects clinically relevant model outputs. We construct a deformable model of the left coronary artery subject to a prescribed inlet pressure and with open-loop outlet boundary conditions, treating fluid-structure interaction through an arbitrary-Lagrangian-Eulerian framework. Random input uncertainty is estimated directly from repeated clinical measurements from intracoronary catheterization and complemented by literature data. We also achieve significant computational cost reductions in uncertainty propagation thanks to multifidelity Monte Carlo estimators of the outputs of interest, leveraging the ability to generate, at practically no cost, one- and zero-dimensional low-fidelity representations of left coronary artery flow, with appropriate boundary conditions. The results demonstrate how the use of multifidelity control variate estimators leads to significant reductions in variance and accuracy improvements with respect to traditional Monte Carlo. In particular, the combination of three-dimensional hemodynamics simulations and zero-dimensional lumped parameter network models produces the best results, with only a negligible (less than 1%) computational overhead.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.