ReviewForestry research2022
Progress and challenges in applying CRISPR/Cas techniques to the genome editing of trees.
Review in Forestry research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Abscisic Acid-Mediated Drought Tolerance inCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Optimizing nitrogen use efficiency in forest plantations: mechanistic insights fromForestry research · 2025Review
- Identification of U6 Promoter and Establishment of Gene-Editing System inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Applications of CRISPR Technologies in Forestry and Molecular Wood Biotechnology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein mediated DNA-free genome editing in larch.Forestry research · 2024Article
- CRISPR/Cas as a Genome-Editing Technique in Fruit Tree Breeding.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- PlantForestry research · 2023Review
- Current status and trends in forest genomics.Forestry research · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the advent of the Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein (Cas) system, plant genome editing has entered a new era of robust and precise editing for any genes of interest. The development of various CRISPR/Cas toolkits has enabled new genome editing outcomes that not only target indel mutations but also enable base editing and prime editing. The application of the CRISPR/Cas toolkits has rapidly advanced breeding and crop improvement of economically important species. CRISPR/Cas toolkits have also been applied to a wide variety of tree species, including apple, bamboo, Cannabaceae, cassava, citrus, cacao tree, coffee tree, grapevine, kiwifruit, pear, pomegranate, poplar, ratanjoyt, and rubber tree. The application of editing to these species has resulted in significant discoveries related to critical genes associated with growth, secondary metabolism, and stress and disease resistance. However, most studies on tree species have involved only preliminary optimization of editing techniques, and a more in-depth study of editing techniques for CRISPR/Cas-based editing of tree species has the potential to rapidly accelerate tree breeding and trait improvements. Moreover, tree genome editing still relies mostly on Cas9-based indel mutation and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.