Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39525399›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in allergy2024

Experimental models of antibiotic exposure and atopic disease.

Katherine Donald, B Brett Finlay

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in allergy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Katherine DonaldMichael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
B Brett FinlayMichael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In addition to numerous clinical studies, research using experimental models have contributed extensive evidence to the link between antibiotic exposure and atopic disease. A number of mouse models of allergy have been developed and used to uncover the specific effects of various microbiota members and perturbations on allergy development. Studies in mice that lack microbes entirely have also demonstrated the various components of the immune system that require microbial exposure. The importance of the early-life period and the mechanisms by which atopy "protective" species identified in human cohorts promote immune development have been elucidated in mice. Finally, non-animal models involving human-derived cells shed light on specific effects of bacteria on human epithelial and immune responses. When considered alongside clinical cohort studies, experimental model systems have provided crucial evidence for the link between the neonatal gut microbiota and allergic disease, immensely supporting the stewardship of antibiotic administration in infants. The following review aims to describe the range of experimental models used for studying factors that affect the relationship between the gut microbiota and allergic disease and summarize key findings that have come from research in animal and

Indexed as

allergiesanimal modelsantibiotics – immune effectatopy & microbiomecell culture modelsgut microbiota

Identifiers

PMID39525399
PMCPMC11543581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.