Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39525322›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in reproductive health

The role of socioeconomic status in uterine fibroid awareness and treatment: a narrative review.

Joyvina Evans, Kennedy Jones

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in reproductive health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joyvina EvansDepartment of Health Management, Howard University, 801 North Capital Street NE, Washington, DC 20059-0001, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0205-3980
Kennedy JonesDepartment of Health Sciences, Howard University, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uterine fibroids, known as leiomyomas, are non-cancerous tumors in women. Uterine fibroids disproportionately affect African American women, as they are more common and severe. Uterine fibroids are the leading cause of hysterectomy in African American women. Over 80% of African American women will receive a uterine fibroids diagnosis before 50. Myomectomies (removal of uterine fibroids) and hysterectomies (removal of the uterus) are more prevalent in African American women due to more significant symptoms. Socioeconomic status, including education and income, influences access to healthcare, with some treatments directly affected by insurance coverage and the cost of the procedure. This review aimed to characterize the socioeconomic disparities and inequities regarding uterine fibroids awareness, perceptions, and treatment and to understand how socioeconomic status impacts knowledge and treatment of uterine fibroids. Recognition of the treatment barriers and decisions due to socioeconomic status is a critical step in ensuring equitable treatment options for women diagnosed with uterine fibroids. A narrative literature review was conducted using PubMed, MedLine, and Google Scholar. A total of 98 articles were returned. After adjusting for the exclusion criteria, 10 articles were included in this review. The review demonstrated the disparities in treatment options based on race and socioeconomic status. Low-income women were more likely to receive more invasive treatment, which resulted in more time off work and increased medical bills. In addition, women in lower-income brackets frequented the emergency department at an increased level. This review underscored the need for additional research to learn about the role of socioeconomic status in uterine fibroid awareness and treatment.

Indexed as

disparitieseducationincomeleiomyomasmyomassocioeconomic statusuterine fibroid

Identifiers

PMID39525322
PMCPMC11550501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.