ArticleCirculation reports2024
Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Driven Frailty Prediction Using Electronic Health Records in Hospitalized Patients With Cardiovascular Disease.
Article in Circulation reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in cardiovascular diagnostics: a systematic review and descriptive analysis of clinical applications and diagnostic performance.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Pooled it
- Frailty as a Surgical Vital Sign: A Narrative Review of Risk Stratification and Outcomes in General Surgery.Cureus · 2026Review
- Article
- Impact of Routine Electrocardiogram Testing in Adult Health Screening on New Outpatient Visit Rates and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality.Circulation reports · 2026Article
- Examination of Social Participation in Older Adults Undergoing Frailty Health Checkups Using Deep Learning Models.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to create a deep learning model for predicting phenotypic physical frailty from electronic medical record information in patients with cardiovascular disease. Methods and Results: This single-center retrospective study enrolled patients who could be assessed for physical frailty according to cardiovascular health study criteria (25.5% [691/2,705] of the patients were frail). Patients were randomly separated for training (Train set: 80%) and validation (Test set: 20%) of the deep learning model. Multiple models were created using LightGBM, random forest, and logistic regression for deep learning, and their predictive abilities were compared. The LightGBM model had the highest accuracy (in a Test set: F1 score 0.561; accuracy 0.726; area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristics [AUC] 0.804). These results using only commonly used blood biochemistry test indices (in a Test set: F1 score 0.551; accuracy 0.721; AUC 0.793) were similar. The created models were consistently and strongly associated with physical functions at hospital discharge, all-cause death, and heart failure-related readmission. Conclusions: Deep learning models derived from large sample sizes of phenotypic physical frailty have shown good accuracy and consistent associations with prognosis and physical functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.