ArticleCirculation reports2024
Outcomes of Older Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Using the Impella Device - Insights From the Japanese Registry for Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device (J-PVAD).
Article in Circulation reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of the Shock Team on Short-Term Outcomes in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock - Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Circulation reports · 2026Article
- Prognostic Impact of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Patients With Suspected Cardiogenic Shock - A Systematic Review.Circulation reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Aging has progressed in several regions of the world with more older patients experiencing acute cardiovascular disease. Impella is a percutaneous potent circulatory support device associated with substantial cost and potential device-related complications. Methods and Results: We analyzed the Japanese nationwide registry, encompassing consecutive patients with cardiogenic shock using Impella. Among 5,718 patients treated between 2020 and 2022, we compared older patients (≥75 years) with younger patients. The primary outcome was the Kaplan-Meier estimated 30-day mortality, and the secondary outcome was Impella-related complications. The median age of the 5,718 patients was 69 (58-77) years, and 1,807 (31.6%) were older, with smaller body mass index, frequent acute coronary syndrome, and infrequent myocarditis. Comorbidities were frequently observed in older patients with a higher ejection fraction and less frequency of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Older patients had a higher 30-day mortality than younger patients (38.9% vs. 32.5%; P<0.0001). The 30-day mortality was statistically equivalent among older subsets (75-79 vs. 80-84 vs. ≥85 years). Device-related complications similarly occurred similarly among the older subsets, except for a modest increase in cardiac tamponade and limb ischemia. Older age, body mass index, myocarditis, prior arrhythmia, shock severity, renal and hepatic impairment, and limb ischemia were associated with 30-day mortality. Conclusions: The selected older patients using Impella exhibited modestly higher 30-day mortality with similar safety profiles. A longer follow up and optimal patient selection are important.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.