ReviewCureus2024
Navigating the Role of Surgery in Optimizing Patient Outcomes in Traumatic Brain Injuries (TBIs): A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in Stereotactic Hematoma Evacuation for Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage and the Value of Multimodal Monitoring.Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Baseline CT radiomics for early prediction of post-traumatic hydrocephalus in traumatic brain injury: development and temporal validation.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Association of Marshall CT Scores with GFAP, UCH-L1, Tau, NfL, and p-Tau231 After Traumatic Brain Injury.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Machine learning-enhanced causal inference of surgical decisions and rehabilitation strategies in traumatic brain injury.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) present with symptoms ranging from a mildly altered level of consciousness to irreversible coma and death. The most severe stage of TBIs is diffuse axonal injury and swelling affecting the whole brain. Management strategies are based on the classification of TBIs by severity and type and range from cognitive therapy sessions to complex surgeries. Neuroimaging modalities, predominantly magnetic resonance imaging, and the clinical Glasgow Coma Scale are principal indicators to diagnose and assess a patient's condition and neurological status and decide optimal treatment modality. In this review, we have summarized the indications and patient outcomes based on neurological and functional status, post-surgical complications, and mortality rates for various life-saving interventional procedures including surgery for brain contusions, intracranial hematomas and penetrating injuries, and craniectomy and ventriculostomy for elevated intracranial pressure and hydrocephalus. Cranioplasty performed for aesthetic purposes has also been explored. Overall quality evidence presented advocates surgery as needed for improved patient outcomes resulting in early recovery and decreased mortality, especially with the emergence of minimally invasive techniques. However, there is still an increased risk of certain complications like infections and bleeding and severe disabilities leading to a vegetative state with surgery. Some guidelines have been formed to provide indications for optimal management of TBI patients including surgeries, although their effectiveness in each individual case is debatable. It is imperative to explore certain key areas like the timing of the surgery and the role of intensive patient monitoring pre- and post-procedure in future studies and lay down guidelines also applicable to resource-limited areas. Also, a deeper understanding of physiological and pathological mechanisms of functional outcomes post-surgery will help clinicians predict the patient's course of recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.