Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39525224›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Balancing a Surgical vs. Non-surgical Approach in Perforated Appendicitis.

Harriet Kaye Austin, Aron S Mcguirt

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Harriet Kaye AustinMedicine, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, USA.
Aron S McguirtGeneral Surgery, Bay Pines Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System, St. Petersburg, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Appendicitis is the inflammation of the appendix, one of the common causes of acute abdomen that may indicate emergency abdominal surgical intervention. However, when complicated by perforation, phlegmon, and/or abscess formation, the standard and traditional treatment with the approach for a surgical intervention has been questioned regarding its risks and benefits. In this case presentation, our patient, who presented with perforated appendicitis complicated by phlegmon formation and ileus, was managed with a conservation approach through antibiotics and percutaneous drain placement. Although a conservative, non-surgical approach with interval appendectomy has become more of the popular approach in developed countries for complicated appendicitis due to increased morbidity in immediate appendectomy due to inflammation-associated adhesions, we wanted to present a case where a conservative approach can still lead to extended hospital stays due to complications.

Indexed as

acute complicated appendicitisappendiceal phlegmonconventional appendectomynonoperative therapy followed by interval appendectomyparalytic ileus

Identifiers

PMID39525224
PMCPMC11549727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.