ArticleCureus2024
Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Alveolar Bone Levels Around Dental Implants and Natural Teeth: A Prospective Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDental implants' efficacy is influenced by the quality and quantity of the osseous tissue present at the site designated for dental implants. Therefore, this study was conducted with the primary objective of assessing marginal bone loss around mandibular posterior dental implants at six and 18 months after prosthesis placement, compared with the contralateral natural tooth. The secondary objective was to determine the correlation between various factors such as periodontal status, age, gender, duration between first and second-stage surgery, and marginal bone loss. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis prospective, split-mouth study was conducted on 24 patients, consisting of two groups: group 1, with single tooth replacement by a dental implant in the posterior mandible, and group 2, a contralateral natural tooth. The bleeding index (BI), probing depth (PD), and marginal bone loss were evaluated using cone-beam computed tomography at six and 18 months follow-up period after prosthesis placement.
resultsSignificant bone loss was observed in both groups across all regions (p < 0.05). The mean marginal bone loss was greater at 18 months in group 1 than at six months of follow-up, whereas in group 2, it was not significant. The total mean marginal bone loss during the follow-up period of 18 months was 0.05 mm on the buccal and lingual side, whereas it was 0.5 mm on the mesial side and 2 mm on the distal side. Similarly, in the control group, the total mean marginal bone loss was 0.03 mm on the buccal and lingual sides, whereas it was 0.04 mm on the mesial and distal sides. The PD and duration of second-stage surgery were significant predictors and showed a significant correlation with marginal bone loss.
conclusionPD and marginal bone loss were significantly higher in the implant group than in the natural tooth group over the follow-up period of 18 months, particularly on the distal side.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.