Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39525187›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Pathology Report Interpretation and Disease Diagnosis Using Fuzzy Logic Embedded in an Artificial Intelligence Framework: A New Paradigm for Digital Technologies.

Nisanth K Nambison, D P Singh, Rakesh Mehar, Smita N Nambison, Hariom Sharma, Divyansh Sharma, Eva Nambison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nisanth K NambisonResearch, Government Homeopathic Medical College and Hospital, Bhopal, IND.
D P SinghGeneral Medicine, LN Medical College and Research Center, Bhopal, IND.
Rakesh MeharPathology, Mahatma Gandhi Memorial (MGM) Medical College, Indore, IND.
Smita N NambisonMedical Technology, Neshlin Medtech Private Limited, Bhopal, IND.
Hariom SharmaCivil Engineering, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology Bhopal, Bhopal, IND.
Divyansh SharmaBiomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Varanasi, Varanasi, IND.
Eva NambisonData Science, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Accurate diagnosis is essential for effective treatment in healthcare settings. Digital technologies have revolutionized medical diagnostics, particularly in pathology laboratory report analyses, by enhancing speed, quality, and precision. Diagnostic pathology has advanced significantly with digital imaging, AI algorithms, and computer-assisted techniques. Traditional machine learning methods require extensive training data, struggle with decision-making flexibility, and lack interpretability when handling new data. Methods This paper introduces a novel approach to address these challenges: a fuzzy logic-based system for interpreting pathology laboratory reports and diagnosing diseases, while considering the restrictions of engineered interpretations so that the degree of reliability of the output of the system is at par with human perception. Results The analysis highlights the impressive accuracy of the fuzzy logic-based diagnosis system, which is closely aligned with professional diagnoses. Notably, it correctly identified "normal" with an 83% probability, showcasing its potential for early disease detection. Performance evaluations indicated that the precision, recall, and

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceblood pathologydiagnosticsdifferential diagnosisdigital pathologydisease diagnosisfuzzy logiclaboratory testpathology laboratory report interpretationtechnologies

Identifiers

PMID39525187
PMCPMC11548983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.