ReviewCureus2024
The Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin Type A (BTA) in the Treatment of Hypertrophic Scars and Keloids: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Treatment of hypertrophic scars using fractional CO2 laser alone in comparison with adding botulinium toxin either intalesional injection or assisted drug delivery.Lasers in medical science · 2026Trial
- [Botulinum toxin preparations in dermatology : Characterization, comparison, and treatment options].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- From Incision to Healing: An Evidence-Based Review of Scar Optimization in Upper Blepharoplasty.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypertrophic scars cause significant physical and emotional discomfort. Botulinum toxin type A (BTA) has shown promising outcomes in reducing scar formation. Research suggested its effectiveness in managing hypertrophic scars and keloids. This systematic review and meta-analysis were reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The included studies involved patients with hypertrophic scars treated with BTA. Five databases were searched from inception to August 2024. Studies were screened and selected by two independent reviewers. Data on study design, patient demographics, and interventions was extracted. The risk of bias (ROB) was assessed using the ROB revised tool developed by Cochrane (ROB2). Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan Web (The Cochrane Collaboration, London, UK) with a random-effects model due to high heterogeneity, calculating mean differences for the primary and secondary outcomes. Outcomes included Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) scores, scar thickness, vascularity, pliability, and pigmentation. The systematic review identified 182 records from five databases. The screening process resulted in seven studies included in the final analysis after assessment for eligibility. The efficacy of BTA in treating hypertrophic scars and keloids was assessed. The meta-analysis showed that BTA significantly improved VSS scores, with a pooled mean difference of -1.69 (P = 0.01). However, BTA did not show a statistically significant effect on reducing scar height/thickness or improving vascularity. Scar pliability was significantly improved by BTA, with a pooled mean difference of -0.76 (P = 0.002), while there was no significant effect on pigmentation. High heterogeneity was observed across the studies. BTA could be used as an effective treatment for the components of hypertrophic scars and keloids, especially regarding their pliability and improving scar quality. However, for functions such as the change in scar height, vascularity, and pigmentation, more research is still required among larger RCTs. Future research should focus on refining the treatment regimens and the mode of action of BTA to the scar tissue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.