Efficacy of Surgical Intervention in Treating Pathological Fractures of the Upper Extremity: A Retrospective Case Series.

backgroundWe conduct a retrospective analysis of patients with pathological fractures resulting from upper extremity malignancies, focusing on the evaluation of treatment strategies employed. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively studied 10 patients with metastatic bone tumors of the upper extremities. The study variables included tumor site, primary pathology, duration from the first diagnosis of the primary lesion to the occurrence of the pathological fracture, use of bone-modifying drugs, surgical technique, adjuvant therapy, postoperative functional assessment, Katagiri's score, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA-PS), outcome, and correlations between the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score.

resultsThe sites involved were the humerus and radius in eight and two patients, respectively. Primary pathologies were liver cancer in three patients, lung cancer and renal cancer in two patients each, and one patient each with multiple myeloma, plasmacytoma, and Hodgkin's lymphoma. Nine patients experienced pathological fractures, and one had an impending fracture. The median time from primary tumor diagnosis to fracture was 12.5 months. Bone-modifying drugs were administered in all cases. Surgical procedures included intramedullary nails in seven patients and plate fixation in two. Chemotherapy served as adjuvant therapy in nine cases. The mean MSTS score was 26.5, and Katagiri's score averaged 6. The median ASA-PS stood at 2. Outcomes showed seven patients alive with disease and three dead from disease. A significant association between the ECOG-PS and MSTS score was not observed.

conclusionPathological fractures caused by malignant bone tumors of the upper extremity should be treated proactively with surgery regardless of prognosis.