Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39525042›Full record

ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2024

ReflACTION framework: A proposed model for implementation of clinical pharmacy services.

Kérilin Stancine Santos Rocha, Sabrina Cerqueira-Santos, Genival Araújo Dos Santos-Júnior, Lincoln Marques Cavalcante-Santos, Fernando de Castro Araújo-Neto, Fernanda Oliveira Prado, Giselle de Carvalho Brito, Divaldo Pereira de Lyra-Jr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kérilin Stancine Santos RochaHealth Sciences Graduate Program. Laboratory of Teaching and Research in Social Pharmacy (LEPFS), Department of Pharmacy, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brazil.
Sabrina Cerqueira-SantosGraduate Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences. Laboratory of Teaching and Research in Social Pharmacy (LEPFS), Department of Pharmacy, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brazil.
Genival Araújo Dos Santos-JúniorResearch Group on Implementation and Integration of Clinical Pharmacy Services in Brazilian Health System (SUS), Department of Pharmacy and Nutrition, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Alegre, Espírito Santo, Brazil.
Lincoln Marques Cavalcante-SantosResearch Center in Pharmaceutical Services and Clinical Pharmacy (CPAFF), Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fernando de Castro Araújo-NetoHealth Sciences Graduate Program. Laboratory of Teaching and Research in Social Pharmacy (LEPFS), Department of Pharmacy, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brazil.
Fernanda Oliveira PradoHealth Sciences Graduate Program. Laboratory of Teaching and Research in Social Pharmacy (LEPFS), Department of Pharmacy, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brazil.
Giselle de Carvalho BritoLaboratory of Studies in Pharmaceutical Care, Department of Pharmacy, Federal University of Sergipe, Lagarto, Sergipe, Brazil.
Divaldo Pereira de Lyra-JrHealth Sciences Graduate Program. Laboratory of Teaching and Research in Social Pharmacy (LEPFS), Department of Pharmacy, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The implementation of clinical pharmacy services (CPS) has grown worldwide. However, few studies have used models and/or frameworks to facilitate the implementation process, especially in a low and middle-income countries. In addition, there are limitations in the ways that implementation frameworks are used. Therefore, this discussion aimed to propose and describe an approach using the ReflACTION framework. ReflACTION emerged from several years of systematic observation and experience of the Laboratory of Teaching and Research in Social Pharmacy (LEPFS) in implementing CPS in different settings of Brazilian health system. These experiences led the research group to systematize the implementation of CPS based on three theorical references: Paulo Freire's theoretical references, the Maguerez Arc and the Apoteca framework. The ReflACTION framework proposes five steps that starts and ends in the setting, which are: observation of reality; gathering key-points; theorization; solution hypothesis; and application to reality. All steps were carried out considering the determinants of the implementation process. For the present study, we highlight the importance of the implementation team, the involvement of stakeholders as well as their dialogue and awareness. Thus, we describe the operationalization process for each step. The ReflACTION framework can be used to describe and guide the implementation process of CPS. We expect the proposed framework may add knowledge to implementation science and, ultimately, achieve desired patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Implementation frameworkImplementation sciencePharmaceutical servicesQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID39525042
PMCPMC11550586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.