ReviewTranslational cancer research2024
Krukenberg tumours: which patients should be considered for surgery?-a narrative literature review.
Review in Translational cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Breast solitary extramedullary plasmacytoma treated with combined systemic therapy and radiotherapy: diagnostic and therapeutic insights from a rare case.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Krukenberg tumours (KTs) are metastatic signet ring cell (SRC) adenocarcinomas of the ovary, arising from the stomach in most cases (70%). Other common primary sites are the colon, appendix and breast. The use of the term "Krukenberg tumour" is inconsistent in the literature which makes data interpretation difficult. Prognosis of KTs is dismal and, in the absence of randomised controlled trials, the best treatment strategies remain controversial. Evidence from retrospective studies suggests that metastectomy is associated with improved survival. Our narrative literature review set out to determine which patients gain maximal survival benefit from surgical management. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar databases, from 1 January 2000 to 15 July 2024, with the terms 'Krukenberg', 'metastatic mucinous adenocarcinoma of ovary'. This search identified 20 full-text manuscripts, including data on 1,815 patients. Key Content and Findings: We found that the overall prognosis of these patients remains poor, with a median overall survival (mOS) ranging between 9 and 50 months. Metastectomy is associated with survival benefit only when all visible disease is removed (R0): mOS in patients with microscopic residual disease (R1) or gross residual disease (R2) is similar to mOS in unresected patients (11 Conclusions: Multiple retrospective analyses have demonstrated that metastectomy is associated with a survival benefit in patients with metastatic mucinous ovarian adenocarcinomas. However, patients with poor prognostic factors are less likely to benefit from surgery and should be counselled accordingly. Diagnostic laparoscopy could be considered before debulking surgery, to assess resectability of disease and to avoid a futile exploratory laparotomy. HIPEC after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) remains controversial, with possible survival benefit for KTs of gastric origin, particularly when peritoneal dissemination is present but the PCI is low.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.