ArticleTranslational cancer research2024
Establishment and validation of a prediction model for gastric cancer with perineural invasion based on preoperative inflammatory markers.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preoperative fibrinogen-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic biomarker for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- The Value of the Preoperative Hematological Inflammatory Markers for Predicting Lymphovascular Invasion in Gastric Cancer.ImmunoTargets and therapy · 2026Article
- Predictive value ofQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Critical Perioperative Factors Influencing Postoperative Complications and Long-Term Survival in Patients with Gastric Cancer.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is a prevalent malignant tumor of the digestive system, characterized by a poor prognosis and high recurrence rate. Perineural invasion (PNI), the neoplastic infiltration of nerves, is a significant predictor of survival outcome in GC. Accurate preoperative identification of PNI could facilitate patient stratification and optimal preoperative treatment. We therefore established and validated a preoperative risk assessment model for GC patients with PNI. Methods: We collected data from 1,195 patients who underwent surgical resection at our hospital between October 2020 and December 2023, with PNI confirmed by pathological examination. We gathered laboratory data, including blood cell count, blood type, coagulation index, biochemical indexes, and tumor markers. Eligible patients were randomly divided into a training set and a testing set at a ratio of 7:3. The important risk factors of PNI were evaluated by random forest package in RStudio. Receiver operating characteristic-area under the curve (ROC-AUC) analysis was used to evaluate the discriminatory ability of the factors for PNI. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were utilized to verity independent risk factors for patients with PNI, and the logistic regression model and nomogram were constructed based on the results. Calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) were conducted to assess the predictive model. Finally, we verified the prediction equation model using the testing set. Results: In the training set, 416 GC patients were pathologically diagnosed with PNI. The top 5 important risk factors for PNI were identified as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), fibrinogen-to-lymphocyte ratio (FLR), D-dimer, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), with optimal cut-off values of 3.89 ng/mL, 2.08, 0.24 mg/L, 122.37, and 14.85 U/mL, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed that CEA, FLR, D-dimer, PLR, CA19-9, and CA72-4 as independent risk factors for PNI (P<0.05). We formulated the following predictive equation: Logit(P) = -1.211 + 0.695 × CEA + 0.546 × FLR + 0.686 × D-dimer + 0.653 × PLR + 0.515 × CA19-9 + 0.518 × CA72-4 (χ Conclusions: We successfully established and validated a prediction model for GC patients with PNI based on hematological indicators, hoping that this model can provide an adjunctive tool for predicting PNI in clinical work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.