Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39524992›Full record

ArticleArthroplasty today2024

Accuracy of a New Augmented Reality Assisted Technique for Total Knee Arthroplasty: An In Vivo Study.

Jasper Lambrechts, Pieter Vansintjan, Cynthia Lapierre, Farah Sinnaeve, Wouter Van Lysebettens, Philippe Van Overschelde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroplasty today, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Augmented Reality-Guided Individualized Total Knee Arthroplasty: Initial Clinical Implementation and Results.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jasper LambrechtsDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, AZ Sint-Jan Bruges, Bruges, Belgium.
Pieter VansintjanHip and Knee Unit Ghent, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium.
Cynthia LapierreHip and Knee Unit Ghent, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium.
Farah SinnaeveHip and Knee Unit Ghent, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium.
Wouter Van LysebettensHip and Knee Unit Ghent, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium.
Philippe Van OverscheldeHip and Knee Unit Ghent, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains the standard of care for treating end-stage osteoarthritis of the knee. Approximately 15%-20% of the patients are dissatisfied following surgery. To improve accuracy and outcomes of TKA, various assistive technologies have been introduced. For this study, an augmented reality (AR) system was explored and tested. Methods: The Knee + system (Pixee Medical, Besancon, France) was used to guide TKA. It uses a combination of quick response-code labeled instruments and AR glasses to guide tibial and femoral cuts. The primary research goal was to evaluate its accuracy by direct comparing the planned angular values for lateral distal femoral angle, medial proximal tibial angle, hip-knee-ankle axis, and tibial slope to the intraoperative obtained values and the measured angles on postoperative full leg radiographs. The secondary research goal was to assess its feasibility. Results: This retrospective study evaluated 124 patients, with a follow-up of at least 1 year. The average absolute difference between planned and measured postop values were 1.39° for lateral distal femoral angle, 1.03° for medial proximal tibial angle, 2.16° for tibial slope, and 1.51° for hip-knee-ankle axis. Within the follow-up period, 8 complications were observed. The average surgical time was 83 minutes. Conclusions: This study has demonstrated a high accuracy, comparable to robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty, of the Knee + AR system. It has shown to be a safe, cheap and time-efficient assistive technology for patients undergoing medial pivot TKA.

Indexed as

AccuracyAugmented realityMedial pivotTKA

Identifiers

PMID39524992
PMCPMC11550726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.