ArticleArthroplasty today2024
Accuracy of a New Augmented Reality Assisted Technique for Total Knee Arthroplasty: An In Vivo Study.
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Augmented Reality-Assisted vs Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty: Clinical and Perioperative Outcomes in a Consecutive Single-Surgeon Cohort.Arthroplasty today · 2026Article
- Augmented Reality-Guided Individualized Total Knee Arthroplasty: Initial Clinical Implementation and Results.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026Article
- Optimizing arthroplasty outcomes: the impact of artificial intelligence and robotic assistance.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Robotic-assisted and AI-augmented arthroplasty: converging technologies in joint replacement.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Improved alignment and reduced peri-operative blood loss with augmented reality-guided total knee arthroplasty: a single-centre comparative study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in total knee arthroplasty: clinical applications and implications.Knee surgery & related research · 2025Review
- Augmented reality navigation improves intraoperative resection accuracy but may not prevent alignment deviations in total knee arthroplasty.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- A systematic literature review on integrating AI-powered smart glasses into digital health management for proactive healthcare solutions.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Augmented reality in total knee arthroplasty: Balancing precision, promise, and challenges in surgical innovation.World journal of orthopedics · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Impact of Mixed-Reality Technology on Operating Room Time in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Comparative Study.Arthroplasty today · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains the standard of care for treating end-stage osteoarthritis of the knee. Approximately 15%-20% of the patients are dissatisfied following surgery. To improve accuracy and outcomes of TKA, various assistive technologies have been introduced. For this study, an augmented reality (AR) system was explored and tested. Methods: The Knee + system (Pixee Medical, Besancon, France) was used to guide TKA. It uses a combination of quick response-code labeled instruments and AR glasses to guide tibial and femoral cuts. The primary research goal was to evaluate its accuracy by direct comparing the planned angular values for lateral distal femoral angle, medial proximal tibial angle, hip-knee-ankle axis, and tibial slope to the intraoperative obtained values and the measured angles on postoperative full leg radiographs. The secondary research goal was to assess its feasibility. Results: This retrospective study evaluated 124 patients, with a follow-up of at least 1 year. The average absolute difference between planned and measured postop values were 1.39° for lateral distal femoral angle, 1.03° for medial proximal tibial angle, 2.16° for tibial slope, and 1.51° for hip-knee-ankle axis. Within the follow-up period, 8 complications were observed. The average surgical time was 83 minutes. Conclusions: This study has demonstrated a high accuracy, comparable to robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty, of the Knee + AR system. It has shown to be a safe, cheap and time-efficient assistive technology for patients undergoing medial pivot TKA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.