Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39524991›Full record

ArticleArthroplasty today2024

The Epidemiology of the Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in the United States From 2016 to 2022.

Sandeep S Bains, Jeremy A Dubin, Christopher G Salib, Rubén Monárrez, Ethan Remily, Daniel Hameed, Gabrielle N Swartz, Reza Katanbaf, James Nace, Ronald E Delanois

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroplasty today, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Effect of Implant Size on Fretting Currents of Acetabular Cup-Liner Tapers During in Vitro Cyclic Loading.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sandeep S BainsRubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, LifeBridge Health, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD 21215, USA.
Jeremy A DubinRubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, LifeBridge Health, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD 21215, USA.
Christopher G SalibRubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, LifeBridge Health, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD 21215, USA.
Rubén MonárrezRubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, LifeBridge Health, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD 21215, USA.
Ethan RemilyRubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, LifeBridge Health, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD 21215, USA.
Daniel HameedRubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, LifeBridge Health, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD 21215, USA.
Gabrielle N SwartzRubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, LifeBridge Health, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD 21215, USA.
Reza KatanbafRubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, LifeBridge Health, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD 21215, USA.
James NaceRubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, LifeBridge Health, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD 21215, USA.
Ronald E DelanoisRubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, LifeBridge Health, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD 21215, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The number of revision total hip arthroplasties (THAs) is projected to reach 572,000 cases annually by 2030 in the United States. This may be attributed to the successes of primary THAs combined with an aging population, patients desire to remain active, and expanded indications for younger patients. Given the evolving nature of revision THAs, an epidemiological analysis of (1) etiologies; (2) demographics, including age and region; and (3) lengths of stay (LOSs) may minimize the gap between appropriate understanding and effective intervention. Methods: From 2016 to 2022, a national, all-payer database was queried. Incidences and indications were analyzed for a total of 102,476 patients who had revision THA procedures. Patients were stratified according to etiology of failure, age, US census region, primary payor class, and mean LOS. Results: The most common etiologies for revision THA procedures were dislocation (16.7%) and infection (12.7%), followed by periprosthetic fracture (6.9%). The largest age group was 65-74 years (30.9%), followed by >75 years (28.6%), then 55-64 (26.5%). The South had the largest total procedure cohort (36.9%), followed by the Midwest (27.5%), then the Northeast (19.7%), and the West (15.9%). The mean LOS was 4.10 days (range, 1.0-20.0). Conclusions: Dislocation and infection remain leading indications for revision THA. These findings can properly guide surgeons toward appropriate management as well as toward active steps to minimizing these outcomes.

Indexed as

DislocationEpidemiologyInfectionRevisionTotal hip arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID39524991
PMCPMC11550771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.