ArticleTherapeutic advances in infectious disease
Emerging trends in fungal endocarditis: clinical complexity, diagnostic challenges, and therapeutic implications - a case series and literature review.
Article in Therapeutic advances in infectious disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Review of Current Insights in Fungal Endocarditis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Assessment of the time taken for blood culture positivity in infectious endocarditis due to Candida and an analysis of the utility of beta-D-glucan in early detection of Candida endocarditis: a multicenter retrospective study.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Fungal infective endocarditis (IE) is a rare, yet increasingly recognised condition associated with substantial mortality rates. Objectives: This study was undertaken to examine the clinical profiles, diagnostic challenges, treatment modalities, and outcomes of four compelling cases involving Methods & Design: This was a descriptive case series study conducted from July 2021 to July 2023. All patients with definite/possible endocarditis diagnosed based on modified Duke's criteria were reviewed in this study. Data on demographics, risk factors, clinical signs and symptoms, echocardiography findings, microbiological aetiology, complications, treatment, and outcomes were collected. Results: Among 212 suspected IE cases reviewed, 54 met the modified Duke's criteria for possible or definite IE, with four instances identified as fungal endocarditis. Conclusion: This study highlights the criticality of early suspicion, prompt diagnosis, and a multidisciplinary approach to managing fungal endocarditis. While recognising the limitations in current diagnostic tools and therapeutic options, the study underscores the urgent need for enhanced diagnostic modalities and novel treatment strategies to improve outcomes in these challenging cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.