Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39524972›Full record

ArticleLiver cancer2024

Oncological Resectability Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Era of Novel Systemic Therapies: The Japan Liver Cancer Association and Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Expert Consensus Statement 2023.

Keiichi Akahoshi, Junichi Shindoh, Minoru Tanabe, Shunichi Ariizumi, Susumu Eguchi, Yukiyasu Okamura, Masaki Kaibori, Shoji Kubo, Mitsuo Shimada, Akinobu Taketomi and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Liver cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Keiichi AkahoshiDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Junichi ShindohDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Minoru TanabeDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Shunichi AriizumiInstitute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Susumu EguchiDepartment of Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.
Yukiyasu OkamuraDivision of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Masaki KaiboriDepartment of Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.
Shoji KuboDepartment of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Mitsuo ShimadaDepartment of Digestive and Transplant Surgery, Tokushima University Hospital, Tokushima, Japan.
Akinobu TaketomiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido, Japan.
Nobuyuki TakemuraDepartment of Surgery, Hepato-Biliary Pancreatic Surgery Division, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroaki NaganoDepartment of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Masafumi NakamuraDepartment of Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Kiyoshi HasegawaHepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Etsuro HatanoDepartment of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Tomoharu YoshizumiDepartment of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Itaru EndoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University, Kanagawa, Japan.
Norihiro KokudoDepartment of Surgery, Hepato-Biliary Pancreatic Surgery Division, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have led to debates about the feasibility of combination therapies, such as systemic therapy combined with surgery or transarterial chemoembolization, for patients with advanced HCC. However, a lack of consensus on the oncological resectability criteria has hindered discussions of "conversion therapy" and the optimal management in patients with HCC. To address this issue, the Japan Liver Cancer Association (JLCA) and the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery (JSHBPS) established a working group and discussed the concept of borderline resectable HCC. Herein, we present a consensus statement from this expert panel on the resectability criteria for HCC from the oncological standpoint under the assumption of technically and liver-functionally resectable situations. The criteria for oncological resectability in HCC are classified into three grades: resectable, representing an oncological status for which surgery alone may be expected to offer clearly better survival outcomes as compared with other treatments; borderline resectable 1, representing an oncological status for which surgical intervention as a part of multidisciplinary treatment may be expected to offer survival benefit; and borderline resectable 2, representing an oncological status for which the efficacy of surgery is uncertain and the indication for surgery should be determined carefully under the standard multidisciplinary treatment. These criteria aim to provide a common language for discussing and analyzing the treatment strategies for advanced HCC. It is also expected that these criteria will be optimized, modified, and updated based on further advancements in systemic therapies and future validation studies.

Indexed as

Borderline resectableConsensusHepatocellular carcinomaOncological criteriaResectability

Identifiers

PMID39524972
PMCPMC11547340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.