Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39524948›Full record

ArticleHCA healthcare journal of medicine2024

Measures of Success: Making the Case for Advanced Practice-Sensitive Quality Indicators.

Ruth Kleinpell, April Kapu, Cynthia Borum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HCA healthcare journal of medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ruth KleinpellVanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville, TN.
April KapuVanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville, TN.
Cynthia BorumHCA Healthcare Clinical Services Group, Nashville, TN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Description Advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) are key health care providers in a variety of settings. Often APRNs are grouped in a collective category, along with physician assistants, and referred to collectively as advanced practice providers. As APRNs assume an increasing role in patient care management in hospital, outpatient, and community settings, such as clinics and rural practices, measuring the impact of their care on patient outcomes and quality of care becomes a necessary component of performance evaluation. APRN-sensitive outcome indicators are an important way to identify the impact of the role. While a number of studies have been conducted that demonstrate APRN outcomes, identifying specific APRN-sensitive outcome indicators can be challenging. This article reviews the use of APRN-sensitive outcome indicators to identify the impact of the APRN role, highlighting exemplars from several clinical practice sites.

Indexed as

advanced practice providersadvanced practice registered nurse (APRN)APRN impactAPRN outcomesAPRN valuenurse practitioner (NP)outcomes assessment

Identifiers

PMID39524948
PMCPMC11547281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.