ArticleHeliyon2024
Research trends and hotspots in fundus image segmentation from 2007 to 2023: A bibliometric analysis.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To understand the current status, research hotspots, and trends of automatic segmentation of fundus lesion images worldwide, providing a reference for subsequent related studies. Methods: The electronic database Web of Science Core Collection was searched for research in the field of automatic segmentation of fundus lesion images from 2007 to 2023. Visualization maps of countries, authors, institutions, journals, references, and keywords were generated and analyzed using the CiteSpace and VOSviewer software. Results: After deduplication, 707 publications were sorted out, showing an overall increasing trend in publication volume. The countries with the highest publication counts were China, followed by India, the USA, the UK, Spain, Pakistan, and Singapore. A high degree of collaboration was observed among authors, and they cooperated widely. The keywords included "diabetic retinopathy," "deep learning," "vessel segmentation," "retinal images," "optic disc localization," and so forth, with keyword bursts starting in 2018 for "retinal images," "machine learning," "biomedical imaging," "deep learning," "convolutional neural networks," and "transfer learning." The most prolific author was U Rajendra Acharya from the University of Southern Queensland, and the journal with the most publications was Conclusions: Compared with manual segmentation of fundus lesion images, the use of deep learning models for segmentation is more efficient and accurate, which is crucial for patients with eye diseases. Although the number of related publications globally is relatively small, a growing trend is still witnessed, with broad connections between countries and authors, mainly concentrated in East Asia and Europe. Research institutions in this field are limited, and hence, the research on diabetic retinopathy and retinal vessel segmentation should be strengthened to promote the development of this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.