ArticleHeliyon2024
Comprehensive comparative evaluation of the eight pediatric estimated glomerular filtration rate equations in a large Korean pediatric patient cohort.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of eGFR equations for estimating kidney function in Chinese children.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Eight Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Equations for Assessing Kidney Function in Korean Pediatric Patients.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Although estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) are continuously developed for pediatric population, impact of height measurement is often neglected due to variable dynamic growth changes in children. This study aimed to compare differential impacts of eGFR values calculated by six equations that do not use height information. Materials and methods: 3503 Korean pediatric patients with creatinine/cystatin C assay-based laboratory results from 2008 to 2021 were analyzed for clinical course using a total of 8113 laboratory test results. Baseline eGFR was calculated by eight different equations including two widely used equations incorporating height parameter. Along with the agreement of CKD (chronic kidney disease) stage categorization by different equations, clinical outcome of incident CKD diagnosis in 13 years of study period were compared. Results: Among a total of 28 pairwise comparisons among eight equations, only 4 combinations of comparisons revealed optimal P15 values (≥80 % concordance), with FAS-age equation being both concordant with two equations using height parameter. Clustering of eight equations by incident CKD diagnosis in subsequent tests also highlighted FAS-age as candidate equation within the same cluster with Schwartz-bedside and FAS-height equations. When the equation values were classified into Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD stages, the distribution patterns for stage 1 and 5 were significantly different among eGFR equations. FAS-age equation revealed the highest agreement with Schwartz-bedside and FAS-height equations that incorporate the height data. Conclusions: The eGFR equation type should be considered to establish the eGFR intervals for CKD stage classification, particularly in the pediatric patient population. Cautious interpretation is required for eGFR value along with clinical context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.