ArticleHeliyon2024
Capecitabine enhances sensitivity to oxaliplatin in advanced gastric cancer and the effects on patients' FOXP1 and GGT levels.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the effect of capecitabine on the sensitivity of oxaliplatin and on the level of transcription factor forkhead box P1 (FOXP1) and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) in patients with intermediate and advanced gastric cancer. Methods: A total of 152 patients with intermediate and advanced gastric cancer diagnosed and treated in our hospital from April 2018 to May 2019 was selected as the research objects, and their clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different treatment methods, they were divided into the study group and the control group, with 76 cases in each group. The patients in the control group received with oxaliplatin, while the patients in the study group received with capecitabine on the basis of the control group. The therapeutic effect was evaluated according to the therapeutic effect evaluation criteria of solid tumors. The FOXP1 expression level in gastric cancer tissues was detected using immunohistochemistry. Serum levels of GGT were measured by chemiluminescence. The prognostic factors were analyzed by COX regression model, and the Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used to analyze the relationship between the influencing factors and the survival of gastric cancer. Results: The effective rate of capecitabine combined with oxaliplatin and oxaliplatin alone in the treatment of patients with intermediate and advanced gastric cancer were 94.74 % and 76.32 % respectively. Capecitabine enhanced the sensitivity of intermediate and advanced gastric cancer to oxaliplatin ( Conclusion: Capecitabine effectively enhanced the sensitivity of intermediate and advanced gastric cancer to oxaliplatin, improved the therapeutic effect, reduced the proportion of patients with low FOXP1 expression rate and serum GGT level, decreased the recurrence rate and ameliorated the prognosis of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.