ArticleHeliyon2024
Assessment of the sentiments expressed by traumatic brain injury patients and caregivers: A qualitative study based on in-depth interviews.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Significant other reported outcome measures within European cohorts of severely injured patients: A systematic review.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Pooled it
- Awake patients' experiences and coping needs during awake prone positioning in general wards: a patient-perspective qualitative study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Adult-Onset Still's Disease Presenting With Persistent Hyperpigmented Scaling Rash in a Young Ethiopian Woman: A Case Report From a Resource-Limited Setting.Clinical medicine insights. Case reports · 2026Article
- Toward the Patient Participation Pathway: A Mixed Methods Study of Patients With Cancer and Other Chronic Diseases.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Contributors to caregiver burden, depression, and anxiety in the partners of professional American-style football players: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Altered Structure-Function Coupling Associated with Attention Decline in Shift Work Disorder.Nature and science of sleep · 2025Article
- Band Acro-Osteolysis as a Less Common Radiologic Pattern in Systemic Scleroderma: A Case Report.Clinical medicine insights. Case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) is a significant public health concern that causes death, disability, and economic burden. Its repercussions affect physical, cognitive, emotional, and behavioral aspects of long-term care needs. Despite improvements in communication among multidisciplinary teams, the management of TBI remains fragmented. Objective: This study aimed to assess patients and caregivers' experiences through sentiment analysis. Materials and methods: A qualitative cross-sectional study utilized structured topic modeling (STM) to analyze in-depth interview data. The study involved 29 patients with TBI and 27 caregivers in Madrid (Spain), using a survey design. The interviews were conducted, transcribed, and coded independently over 5 months. Sentiments such as anticipation, fear, and emotional concerns were analyzed using three dictionaries. The STM analysis identified four key concepts: desire for independence, potential improvement, need for injury information, and psychological consequences. STM diagnostic graphs were used to determine the number of topics relevant to the evaluation of patient and caregiver concerns. Furthermore, an analysis was conducted across four topics. Results: The average age of the patients was 44.2 ± 14.9 years (69 % males). Regarding TBI severity, 59 % of patients had severe TBI, whereas the remaining 41 % had experienced moderate TBI. Among the caregivers, the majority were parents (30 %), partners (24 %), or siblings (24 % each). Among the 51 participants, sentiments were analyzed using three dictionaries. While there were no significant age differences (Z = 0.24, p = 0.815), the STM model was adjusted for significant sex differences (p = 0.017) between patients and relatives. Anticipation and fear prevailed in both groups, highlighting the shared emotional patterns. Discussion: The analysis of diagnostic graphs indicated the optimal number of topics for evaluation, emphasizing key concerns across different phases of TBI. Patients' main worries shifted from physical symptoms to limitations in daily life and independence. Caregivers highlighted the importance of staff interactions, misinformation challenges, and the need for psychological care. Conclusion: Key patient concerns, including dependency on daily activities, limitations in autonomy, and caregiver burden, emphasize crucial areas for enhancement in multidisciplinary treatment. Moreover, the lack of long-term psychological support is a significant barrier to optimal patient and caregiver well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.