Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39524824›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Assessment of the sentiments expressed by traumatic brain injury patients and caregivers: A qualitative study based on in-depth interviews.

Raquel Mena-Marcos, Eleuterio A Sánchez-Romero, Blanca Navarro-Main, Alfonso Lagares-Gómez-Abascal, Laura Jiménez-Ortega, Juan Nicolás Cuenca-Zaldívar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Significant other reported outcome measures within European cohorts of severely injured patients: A systematic review.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Raquel Mena-MarcosDepartment of Paediatric Surgery, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Eleuterio A Sánchez-RomeroDepartment of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Sport Sciences, European University of Madrid, Villaviciosa de Odón, 28670, Madrid, Spain.
Blanca Navarro-MainDepartment of Psychiatry, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Alfonso Lagares-Gómez-AbascalInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Imas12, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Laura Jiménez-OrtegaDepartment of Psychobiology, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Juan Nicolás Cuenca-ZaldívarInterdisciplinary Research Group on Musculoskeletal Disorders, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670, Villaviciosa de Odón, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) is a significant public health concern that causes death, disability, and economic burden. Its repercussions affect physical, cognitive, emotional, and behavioral aspects of long-term care needs. Despite improvements in communication among multidisciplinary teams, the management of TBI remains fragmented. Objective: This study aimed to assess patients and caregivers' experiences through sentiment analysis. Materials and methods: A qualitative cross-sectional study utilized structured topic modeling (STM) to analyze in-depth interview data. The study involved 29 patients with TBI and 27 caregivers in Madrid (Spain), using a survey design. The interviews were conducted, transcribed, and coded independently over 5 months. Sentiments such as anticipation, fear, and emotional concerns were analyzed using three dictionaries. The STM analysis identified four key concepts: desire for independence, potential improvement, need for injury information, and psychological consequences. STM diagnostic graphs were used to determine the number of topics relevant to the evaluation of patient and caregiver concerns. Furthermore, an analysis was conducted across four topics. Results: The average age of the patients was 44.2 ± 14.9 years (69 % males). Regarding TBI severity, 59 % of patients had severe TBI, whereas the remaining 41 % had experienced moderate TBI. Among the caregivers, the majority were parents (30 %), partners (24 %), or siblings (24 % each). Among the 51 participants, sentiments were analyzed using three dictionaries. While there were no significant age differences (Z = 0.24, p = 0.815), the STM model was adjusted for significant sex differences (p = 0.017) between patients and relatives. Anticipation and fear prevailed in both groups, highlighting the shared emotional patterns. Discussion: The analysis of diagnostic graphs indicated the optimal number of topics for evaluation, emphasizing key concerns across different phases of TBI. Patients' main worries shifted from physical symptoms to limitations in daily life and independence. Caregivers highlighted the importance of staff interactions, misinformation challenges, and the need for psychological care. Conclusion: Key patient concerns, including dependency on daily activities, limitations in autonomy, and caregiver burden, emphasize crucial areas for enhancement in multidisciplinary treatment. Moreover, the lack of long-term psychological support is a significant barrier to optimal patient and caregiver well-being.

Indexed as

Multidisciplinary managementPerspectivesSentimentsStructural topic modelTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID39524824
PMCPMC11546493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.