Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39524822›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

Emerging Gene-editing nano-therapeutics for Cancer.

Najma Nujoom, Manzoor Koyakutty, Lalitha Biswas, Thangarajan Rajkumar, Shantikumar V Nair

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Capacity of Understanding the Future Approaches in Cancer Treatment by Multiple Models of Artificial Intelligence.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  2. Nanoparticle-enhanced CRISPR delivery: paving the path forAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Najma NujoomAmrita School of Nanosciences and Molecular Medicine, Amrita Vishwavidyapeetham (University), Ponekkara P.O., Kochi, India.
Manzoor KoyakuttyAmrita School of Nanosciences and Molecular Medicine, Amrita Vishwavidyapeetham (University), Ponekkara P.O., Kochi, India.
Lalitha BiswasAmrita School of Nanosciences and Molecular Medicine, Amrita Vishwavidyapeetham (University), Ponekkara P.O., Kochi, India.
Thangarajan RajkumarAmrita School of Nanosciences and Molecular Medicine, Amrita Vishwavidyapeetham (University), Ponekkara P.O., Kochi, India.
Shantikumar V NairAmrita School of Nanosciences and Molecular Medicine, Amrita Vishwavidyapeetham (University), Ponekkara P.O., Kochi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Remarkable progress has been made in the field of genome engineering after the discovery of CRISPR/Cas9 in 2012 by Jennifer Doudna and Emmanuelle Charpentier. Compared to any other gene-editing tools, CRISPR/Cas9 attracted the attention of the scientific community because of its simplicity, specificity, and multiplex editing possibilities for which the inventors were awarded the Nobel prize for chemistry in 2020. CRISPR/Cas9 allows targeted alteration of the genomic sequence, gene regulation, and epigenetic modifications using an RNA-guided site-specific endonuclease. Though the impact of CRISPR/Cas9 was undisputed, some of its limitations led to key modifications including the use of miniature-Cas proteins, Cas9 Retron precise Parallel Editing via homologY (CRISPEY), Cas-Clover, or development of alternative methods including retron-recombineering, Obligate Mobile Element Guided Activity(OMEGA), Fanzor, and Argonaute proteins. As cancer is caused by genetic and epigenetic alterations, gene-editing was found to be highly useful for knocking out oncogenes, editing mutations to regain the normal functioning of tumor suppressor genes, knock-out immune checkpoint blockade in CAR-T cells, producing 'off-the-shelf' CAR-T cells, identify novel tumorigenic genes and functional analysis of multiple pathways in cancer, etc. Advancements in nanoparticle-based delivery of guide-RNA and Cas9 complex to the human body further enhanced the potential of CRISPR/Cas9 for clinical translation. Several studies are reported for developing novel delivery methods to enhance the tumor-specific application of CRISPR/Cas9 for anticancer therapy. In this review, we discuss new developments in novel gene editing techniques and recent progress in nanoparticle-based CRISPR/Cas9 delivery specific to cancer applications.

Indexed as

Alternatives of CRISPR/Cas9CancerCRISPR/Cas9Gene-editingNanoparticlesNon-viral delivery

Identifiers

PMID39524822
PMCPMC11550658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.