ArticleHeliyon2024
Hemolytic anemia after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): A case report.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In clinical practice, intravascular hemolysis is not common after interventional cardiovascular procedures. Although diagnostic and treatment techniques have developed, with the increasing importance placed on people's own health and the popularity of cardiovascular intervention, there have been occasional reports of hemolysis after different cardiovascular interventions, mainly including cardiac pacemaker implantation, atrial-fibrillation radiofrequency ablation, transcatheter aortic-valve implantation (TAVI), transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) and percutaneous repair of Gerbode defect and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with Impella. However, so far, there have been no relevant reports on postoperative hemolysis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Case report: This article reports a very rare case of a 42-year-old male who developed hemolysis after PCI. The patient had dark brown urine for two days. Blood test showed significant decreases in red blood cell (RBC) and hemoglobin (Hb). After blood transfusion of 2 units, dexamethasone treatment and repeat PCI, he gradually recovered with no symptoms of further episodes of hemolysis. Conclusions: Due to the use of antiplatelet and anticoagulation drugs in PCI patients, gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is often believed to be the main cause of postoperative bleeding events. Identifying the etiology of anemia in patients after PCI is crucial for targeted treatment in the later stage. Based on the symptoms of dark brown urine and the levels of RBC, HB, reticulocyte and unconjugated bilirubin (UCB), we finally diagnosed the patient with hemolytic anemia (HA), rather than the traditional consciousness of GIB. This is an uncommon case of hemolysis after PCI. Although the association between PCI and HA is very rare, PCI is now a commonly used treatment for patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Therefore, clinicians should recognize that in addition to GBI, HA may also occur after PCI. Early recognition of the cause of anemia and early treatment is one of the key steps to ensure the later life and health of PCI patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.