ArticleHeliyon2024
Risk detection and assessment in small-scale metalworking industries of southwest Ethiopia.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Workplace accidents present a significant challenge in the number of risks, working environment, and the number of workers exposed to them. These risk factors require systematic management, assessment, and control. Therefore, the present study aims to assess risk detection and assessment in small-scale metalwork industries in Jimma City, southwest Ethiopia." Methods: Data collection from two hundred employers and managers was conducted using a cross-sectional study design, incorporating a worksheet, observation, risk-detecting checklists, and technical documents. Finally, the percentage, frequency, and chi-square tests were utilized to analyze the risk factors identified in small-scale metalworking industries, and independent variables that showed a significant correlation with each dependent variable at p < 0.05 were selected for further analysis. Results: The findings showed, 1460 risks at a workshop, out of which 6.85 % were first rank, 2.74 % second rank, 73.97 % third rank, and 16.44 % were fourth rank. The most hazardous units were metal part assembly, handling, cutting, and electrical welding. Moreover, factors like heat, electric shock from the machine, noise, and vibration have an association with the occurrence of physical risk factors among the participants. Furthermore, excessive force, lifting and carrying heavy weight by hand, uncomfortable hand tools, and repetitive activity were associated with the incidence of moderate ergonomic risk factors. In addition, exposure to spraying mists, and explosion of gases and liquids under pressurized chemicals causes moderate incidence among participants. Finally, lack of experience and skills, poor work relations with colleagues and supervisors, lack of concentration, work overcapacity, and lack of training were causes of psychosocial risk factors among the participants. Conclusions: The findings reveal a multitude of risks across various ranks, with factors such as lack of knowledge, negligence of safety measures, and stress emerging as significant contributors. Addressing these issues through comprehensive safety protocols and training initiatives is paramount to ensuring the well-being of workers and the effective management of workplace risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.