ArticleHeliyon2024
Three-dimensional visualization techniques improve surgical Decision Making of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modified internal traction technique for improved exposure in retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for dorsal hilar tumors: a preliminary single-center experience.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Comparative Analysis of Robotic and Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: Insights Into Precision and Efficiency.Advances in urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Complete preoperative comprehension of the adjacent structures of the kidney and location of renal vessels is essential for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). The effectiveness of three-dimensional (3D) visualization techniques in improving perioperative outcomes of RAPN has been inconsistent and has not been reported in Northeastern China. Methods: In this cohort study, we reviewed patients with renal tumours who underwent RAPN between April 2019 and April 2024. Three-dimensional visualization models were reconstructed to evaluate resectability parameters, including vascular variations, collection system infiltration, and lymphatic involvement. Subsequently, a meta-analysis combining previous studies utilising 3D visualization techniques for partial nephrectomy was conducted. Results: Of the 324 patients in the cohort, 147 were preoperatively evaluated using the 3D technology. Group 3D had significantly less estimated blood loss (P < 0.001) and a shorter operative time (P = 0.016) than in group No 3D. We also found that the rates of intraoperative ultrasound use (P = 0.015), intraoperative complications (P = 0.007), intraoperative transfusions (P = 0.007), and postoperative Clavien complications (P < 0.001) in group 3D were significantly lower than in group No 3D. The above findings were consistent in the subgroup with R.E.N.A.L. ≥ 8 points partly. Furthermore, a meta-analysis identified 11 studies that included 1522 patients who underwent RAPN. Use of 3D visualization technology resulted in decreased 55 % risk of opening the collecting system (Risk Ratio [RR] = 0.45[0.22-0.92], P = 0.030) and 79 % incidence of conversion to radical nephrectomy (RR = 0.21[0.08-0.57], P = 0.002). The RAPN group assisted by 3D visualization techniques showed an 81 % reduction in the risk of blood transfusion than in the control group (RR = 0.19[0.08-0.44], P < 0.001). Conclusions: The application of 3D technology in RAPN appears to be superior for improving precise tumour removal and reducing adverse perioperative outcomes and should be considered for wide use in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.