ArticleHeliyon2024
Examining the factors affecting sustained use in smart interactive cabinet design: A comparative analysis using SEM and fsQCA.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the factors that contribute to sustained user use is critical to the design and marketing of smart interactive cabinets, which have gained great popularity in recent years. This study investigates the factors that impact users' intentions to continue using smart interactive cabinets and examines how these factors influence product design and marketing strategies. However, existing research has mainly focused on the development and performance evaluation of smart interaction technologies, with less attention paid to users' continued willingness to use smart interaction cabinets and their determinants. To address this gap, 304 valid samples were randomly collected for empirical analysis and hypothesis testing, and a questionnaire survey was administered to 304 young Chinese urban Chinese users born in the 1980s and 1990s. By synthesizing and analyzing the usage patterns and influencing factors among young consumers, the study employs a combination of covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM) and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to evaluate the data. The analysis highlights the significance of perceived usefulness, ease of use, and innovation in predicting users' intentions to continue using smart interactive cabinets. This study offers insights into the factors influencing continued use and provides valuable guidance for manufacturers and marketers in designing and marketing smart interactive products to enhance user experience and satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.