Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39524710›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

A new multi-epitope DNA vaccine against Helicobacter Pylori infection in a BALB/c mouse model.

Zahra Azami, Mahnaz Farahmand, Mahsa Kavousi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Vaccines · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zahra AzamiDepartment of Biology, East-Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Mahnaz FarahmandDepartment of Biology, East-Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Mahsa KavousiDepartment of Biology, East-Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Methods: Four target antigenic proteins (outer membrane beta-barrel, outer membrane beta, HofA, and hcp beta-lactamase-like protein) were used to identify epitopes. The best B and T cell epitopes were selected to induce humoral and cellular immune responses and were connected using the HEYGAEALERAG and GGGS linkers. The peptide's physicochemical characteristics, secondary and tertiary structures, antigenicity, and allergenicity were evaluated utilizing several bioinformatics tools. The multiepitope peptide was successfully inserted into the pcDNA3.1 expression vector. The immunological responses of both the vaccinated and control groups were evaluated by measuring cytokines and antibodies. Results: Based on the data, the multiepitope peptide consists of 278 amino acid residues and has an average molecular weight (MW) of 28643.61 Da. The peptide residues were mainly situated within the preferred and permitted areas of the Ramachandran plot, accounting for 92.86 % of the total. The VaxiJen server has calculated that the multiepitope peptide has an antigenicity score of Conclusions: The results demonstrated that the multiepitope DNA vaccine elicited significant humoral and cellular responses, and increased survival time in BALB/c mice, indicating that selecting potential epitopes may be a viable technique for developing multiepitope-based vaccines. This can help to introduce effective vaccines.

Indexed as

Bioinformatics analysisH. PyloriIn-silicoNovel vaccine

Identifiers

PMID39524710
PMCPMC11546231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.